1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Osama, easy. He's a family man and would show absolute respect and kindness towards the child as is the custom of his religion and his culture.
He has nothing against children and has a big household with other kids mine can play with.
My child will also be damn safe there and get great food.
Such an easy contest.
But would they be safe from US bombs?
I mean they were for like 40 years and in the end they got snitched out and took out by a seal team so, probably.
US bombs are more calibrated to hit weddings.
Osama for sure.
Bin laden and its not close
Bin Laden loved his kids. Part of the reason he moved to that compound in Pakistan was because he wanted his kids to have a semblance of a normal life. He's discuss politics with is Eldest daughters. When he was captured he was found asleep with his youngest son.
Western educated man who is pissed off at the US for abandoning his political ascension? Slightly better than a meth addicted turboracist, a crazy murderer, and a child molester. I doubt bin Laden is going to be able to do much opinion changing in a single evening and I doubt that he'd outright kill or molest them.
Bin Laden fathered 24 children, the first of which was with his first cousin when she was 16 and he was 17. They went on to have ten more children. The other 13 were spread amongst five other wives. They also found several beheading videos on his computer. He also believed muslims should kill any US civilians they find until the US withdraws support for Israel.
I think definitely killing and maybe molestation would be on the table.
He was a wealthy politician first, revolutionary like fifth. Shit, you're right, molestation is on the table.
TIL that Hitler isn't the "Worst" option for everything lol
Depends on how white you are I guess.
I think im going bin laden
Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.
Osama bin Laden cuz I work with the CIA too.
I know for a fact Bin Laden had games and the movie Cars on his computer. Safest bet.
Pretty sure I remember seeing he had a bunch of Naruto fansubs on his computer, too. He could even watch your weird kid and keep them entertained for the night.
I don't know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden's the safe bet here
Top left: Lindsay Clancy - Apparently strangled her 3 kids, there is an ongoing process in the US right now
Top right: Osama Bin Laden - Former boss of the Taliban in Afghanistan and responsible for 9/11
Bottom left: Adolf Hitler - Leader of the German NSDAP and responsible for the Holocaust and WW2
Bottom right: Sean Combs aka P. Diddy - US musician, multiple cases of sexual violence and rape, and proliferation of prostitution
There is no question that she strangled them. The court is trying to determine whether she was sufficiently sane at the time to be held culpable.
Not according to one of the jurors:
"At the end of the day, there was so much doubt," the woman said. "The prosecution didn't have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it. There was too much gray area."
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-juror-interview/
Couple that with the the sketchy findings about the husband's actions and whereabouts, there is indeed question and reasonable doubt.
My three kids are in their 20's. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I'd say they're safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
Best send them to Bin Laden then because at least they wouldn't be able to sit up all night raiding the bar.
Bin laden i guess, the other option is a child murderer, a child molester or the corpose of THE nazist soo
I'd pass the Nurnberg check, so Hitler would a solid first-round pick. It's a toss about who would gendercode my kids more between him and Bin Laden. Lindsay What's-Her-Name and P. Diddy are automatic no's.
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
Tbh, I don't know who the lady is
I think that's the lady currently on trial for murdering her three kids.
Now I know, and
Laden, as long as there's no american tower around, the kids should be okay.
Honestly, as much as this surprises me, but from those 4 options, my kids would probably be safest with hitler. I assume the first woman is the one that just killed her 3 kids, so that's a fundamental NOPE, diddy, yeah nah, that guy is just weird. So it boils down to the islamic terrorist and the cocaine-addicted, so I'd just give it hitler and hope he has a good day without thaaaaat much cocaine.