I am in favour. Until then you can use consent-o-mattic to actively deny cookies instead of just hiding the element.
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
50825 readers
1470 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Denying consent is just 1 part of the puzzle. You will still be accepting all "legitimate interests".
I hope this becomes mandatory, I think DNT failed because it wasn't
dnt failed because it relied on you sending more information to sites you visited.
For the past 10 years or so tracking is done with hardware fingerprinting anyways. Cookies are of the past.
I understand the argument, but afaik the laws that made poeple create cookie banners do not really care whether it's a cookie or some other identification. Consent has to be granted for any sort of tracking.
However, as far as I understand, at least in some parts of the world, this is only true for 3rd party tracking solutions. So long as people can't be identified and everything stays with your own host, consent would legally be unnecessary anyway.
More accurately, there has never been a EU law that forced people to create cookie banners.
The EU law required websites to have the users' consent to use personal data and tracking. The law never even mentioned the word "banner" but this is what the industry chose as a solution.
Furthermore consent is not needed for functional cookies. So all websites that enforce cookie banners upon users do really use tracking/data sharing or their partners (such as Google Analytics) do.
I am not against cookie banners, I own a few web apps and each of them have proper configurable cookie settings (including the banner).
All I am saying is that most companies (especially one's that do not reside in EU) do not care and will track you across websites by fingerprinting your hardware when visiting their website. Some do not even use cookies at all.