this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
440 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

67543 readers
1598 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Omarchy should not matter. But sadly it does. As a power grab.

If you don’t know what Omarchy is here’s the short summary. David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of RubyOnRails, owner of a software business and millionaire, decided a few months ago to go all in on Linux and – because that’s just his MO – thought that turning his setup into a project made sense. Omarchy is just that: A pretty standard Arch Linux distribution with a handful of configuration files, that Heinemeier Hansson (or DHH as he is often called) wrote, or vibed or whatever. There is nothing wrong with this, custom, opinionated special purpose distributions have been part of the Linux culture for a long time and provide a lot of value and experimentation that sometimes even flows back to the original project. In a way Ubuntu Linux is just that to the basis Debian.

There’s also nothing wrong in more opinionated software – quite the opposite. I do think that RubyOnRails and similar frameworks gained traction especially because they do have a clear idea of how they see the respective problem domain. There’s even the statement “There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it” in the Zen of Python. Having a strong point of view is not a bad thing in software or in general. The problem is the kind of points of view DHH has.

I don’t want to go into all the gritty details here, Brennan Kenneth Brown did a great job with their article “Normalized Fascism in Open Source: $12 Million Given to DHH“, but here’s the short version. DHH is a racist and a fascist. He recently wrote articles on how there are [Content Warning: massive racism] too many brown people in London these days. In July he wrote an [Content Warning: Racism, anti-romanism] article comparing Roma communities (using a slur for them) to “wolves” that should be “shot”. His X account is also know to be “edgy” in a similar way. A few days ago he posted sort of a manifesto for his set of config files:

There’s even a longer version on the website. Even without a strong background in antifascist literature or history this reads like a fascist creed. About unity and identity. About “holding the line” (against codes of conduct and the rights of marginalized people as the website explains). About how there always needs to be a strong leader who makes the decisions. Given DHH’s other writing this is not a misguided joke, this is how he thinks about the world.

I began this text writing “Omarchy should not matter” but I have not explained why it does. It’s surely not about user numbers (it’s a clunky distro aimed at people who love to cosplay hackers). But it is about power.

DHH has used his connection to CEO’s of tech corporations and his position as influencer to collect up to now above 18 million dollars of funding for Omarchy. He uses that money not for himself (he has enough of that) but to fund certain pieces of Software he uses in his distribution. Like for example the window manager hyprland whose main developer the Omarchy money now funds. What is “Vaxry” known for outside of a niche window manager? He runs a community based around LGBTQ discrimination and participates in that (see the short summary on Drew DeVault’s “Weird Little Guys of FOSS” list). His bigotry is so consistent that he was banned from participating in the Freedesktop.org community where all the other developers of window managers and the free software desktop stack collaborate. And it was long before DHH funded him.

One could see a world where a CEO using his connections to drum up some funding for free software projects would be a good thing. But that’s not the world we live in I am afraid. DHH got 3 million USD from Digital Ocean (a cloud provider) for Omarchy. Basically at the same time where Digital Ocean cancelled their support of Flathub and GNOME that amounted to a value of 50 USD per month.

DHH is using his position and his influence to accumulate donations that he then can distribute to projects that align with his fascist worldview and ambitions. And in a time where many important projects and infrastructures are strapped for cash running just on the goodwill of a handful of people that is increasingly dangerous. Not because its corporate money – a lot of funding for open source comes from corporations, they are after all who are sucking up all the surplus from people’s labor. It’s because this amount of money gives him power.

The Omarchy foundation will be where projects in desperate need of funding will be pointed. And will a project focused on human rights and social justice get funding from our fascist overlord? What kind of pressure can that exert on projects who have to decide to either die due to lack of funding or kill their code of conduct?

An open fascist is building one of the bigger sources of funding for open source fully under his individual control and sucks up a lot of money that otherwise might have gone to liberatory projects. Community projects. Antifascist projects.

And that is why Omarchy matters. Sadly. Not because of its technical merit (even though those fascists love to use the “merit” argument to fight human rights) but because of its leader, his connections and his ability to accumulate financial power. Without anyone in that ecosystem saying anything about how that leader operates and talks. And you might know the saying: If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

Omarchy got a lot of recognition recently. Not only by corporate donors but by Youtubers and other tech influencers who kept praising it and nudged people (who might not know about DHH’s exploits) towards testing it. To become “a hardcore linux user/dev” or whatever other chauvinist argument they made. This makes it dangerous.

Running Omarchy means contributing to this dynamic. It means willingly integrating oneself into a fascist community. Legitimizing it. Supporting it. Omarchy is a fascist project that normalizes fascist thinking for everyone entering that community (even unknowingly). The baseline has to be not to use that system. And as people who believe in human rights and dignity, in community and a tech world that can be better we need to oppose Omarchy. Need to make sure it gets no seat at any table. Support projects who actively refuse to collaborate. Support projects who care about human rights and flourishing. And do not do business with the companies who willingly support fascists.

Siamo tutti antifascisti!

(Share this message about Omarchy [or some other similar post] around in the tech circles you frequent. Tell people about the background of this hyped Linux distribution and its fascist leader. Quit your 1password or Digital Ocean accounts and mention that it is because the support fascists.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago

Damn I knew some fascist movements were trying to take over the environmentalist scene but I wouldn't have imagined fascists meddeling with open source.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 41 points 15 hours ago (16 children)

Timeless quote:

If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 37 points 16 hours ago

Omarchy is Hannah Montana Linux for bigots.

[–] jrcruciani@lemmy.wtf 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 hours ago

neocities

This now should have TWO upvotes from me!

(come on lemmy devs get to it)

[–] HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world 47 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I never thought an operating system would get milkshake-ducked. Literally, in the span of 24 hours, I went from:

  • 0h - Never heard of Omarchy
  • 12h - YouTube homepage flooded with dozens of videos about how cool Omarchy is
  • 24h - Omarchy is run by fascists.
[–] stat_rosa@lemy.nl 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You and me both. I love Arch and I think Omarchy is great. Then I thought "let's look this guy up...". Unfortunately, he now has a bigger stage to spread his hate and it is very disturbing to see the companies who support him (they will claim they support the product, not the guy).

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 15 points 15 hours ago

Tech billionaires love funding bigots. See the entire far right in Europe. If they just have their discriminatory world view they'll keep promoting if when then they grow. And if they stop funding dries up.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

"Wait what? I can distribute my setup on linux??"

"Yeah"

"LET'S FUCKING GOO WE CAN PRETEND IT'S A DISTRO AND MAKE CASH"

[–] ejs@piefed.social 18 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

i’m so incredibly annoyed by the fact that my previously favorite hosting provider digital ocean decided to fund this ridiculousness… any favorite alternatives anyone can offer?

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Has anyone sent word to digital ocean about why people would be upset about their funding decision? Might be best not to immediately attribute to malice what could be attributed to not knowing.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] Starkon@lemmy.ml 9 points 15 hours ago

Hetzner, netcup

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

Excellently written. I’m going to borrow this line of reasoning next time I hear Omarchy brought up at work

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 24 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

One thing I haven't really figured out yet, and it may be because there isn't an answer, is why some of these companies could plausibly be genuinely sending money to Omarchy.

Like, Digital Ocean. They're a headless server company. So... why are they donating anything to a desktop distro? There's nothing Digital Oceany about Omarchy as far as I understand.

It feels like someone was like "Guys, I made open source chicken feed" and Linode was like "son of a bitch I'm in", I just don't get it.

Ignoring the part where they just like the vibes and want to spend their money on... favour? I don't even know that the company pretends to get out of it... Like, how would one pitch this expense to shareholders? We use company money to fund projects we don't use, that have nothing to do with our business, because the guy running the project we don't use is mean to people who aren't white enough for him? And that's what we're spending your money on?

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

Private capital supported and bankrolled Hitler, Mussolini and plenty of other fascists, if you have the time and energy to read a book on it, Blackshirts and Reds explains this better and it's fairly accessible!

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 11 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"Gee, why would these corporations be into fascism? I've never read a book before."

[–] liberatedGuy@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

What have you achieved by reading books? Seems like nothing. Someone out here is genuinely curious and you have to resort to cheap insults. May be learn some etiquette.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 16 points 18 hours ago

Well could be these companies are buying on fascism because they're either run by fascists or being shaken down by fascists or their friends are fascists encouraging them to do this and they uncritically do so for some vague or not so vague promises. So it's more a signal of obedience and doubling down on the move to open, naked reaction and taking over open source with fascism.

That or its an intelligence op and the fascism is a bonus but the guy behind it is just pliable or a useful tool and there are larger plans to use this as a vehicle for influence to control open source, insert back-doors, push CIA coder guys into the right positions, steer in anti-China stuff to carve up the world of open source into strictly divided western and non-western code, remove openness and cooperation and militarize the space for American use.

Either way not good as functionally this is a big money pot being created and centralized under reactionary control to bully open source into adopting reactionary politics and other not good things. Could be Linux is seen as increasingly a threat with the open spying on Microsoft driving enough of the public to Linux that corporations, governments, etc feel a need now to seize control of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›