this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
897 points (97.7% liked)

memes

22650 readers
1803 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

From what I've heard it's largely from less smoking and more sunscreen

[–] LazyOldPervert@lemmus.org 3 points 1 hour ago

Also waaaaaaaay less drinking

My brother is an early 70's born gen x, I'm a late 80's born millennial. From what I've seen drinking and smoking being publicly accessible and socially acceptable made them way more prevelantly indulged in.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 18 hours ago

Guy on left can afford nice shirt.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Lots of very important things, but mostly the smoking.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 3 points 1 hour ago

But it isn't? It's crazy how Lemmy just overconfidently states this multiple times even it's actually sun exposure that aged people so much back then .

Also having kids.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

true. i saw some people who were 80 and looked like 250. like walking corpses. incredible. probably waaay too many sunburns, etc.

[–] Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yes the thing that changed was lead posioning from gas and chain smoking cigs starting at 12

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Also pesticides were even more unregulated than they are now. Remember how they just sprayed DDT everywhere in the 40's till the 70's. Even on directly on people. Shit had multigenerational consequences, even grandchildren of people who had a high exposure to that stuff are being affected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but the hair loss is real.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

ever since i found out about this a few years ago i'm telling everyone i meet: there's fantastic medication against hair loss, and it even causes side effects! such as mild boob growth

note that only some meds to that, while others do not.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

In rare cases it also causes permanent erectile dysfunction, so probably isn't the best thing to be recommending everyone takes.

[–] Yew@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Recently watched The Seven Year Itch (1955) and the man claims to be 37. He looks like a young 50. Cigarettes.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

It isn't cigarettes. It's being outside in the sun a lot more that really ages. Cigarettes are can but don't age people nearly as much as UV does.

[–] VeganBtw@piefed.social 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just watched One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and Nicholson was 38 during filming. I thought he looked 50 too.

qYNtGhPjHCmEj2W.png

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

No, he definitely looks well into 45+

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I’m 38. He does not look 38.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Well he doesn't look 50 that's for sure. His hairline isn't great, but people in their 20s can have a fucked up hairline.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 day ago

In addition to people not smoking anymore, direct Sun exposure has dropped dramatically too.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The one in the left married at 23 and his 4 kids.*fix his=has

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm 40 and I look like the second picture

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have the body of the left but the clothing of the right.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The gabagool has a hold on you

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This gives a pretty good explanation of the psychology

https://youtu.be/vjqt8T3tJIE

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

There was a real missed opportunity to have a picture of Jason Alexander (who was in his 30's during most of Seinfeld's production) instead of James Gandolfini.

Still true tho

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, It's not only cigarettes, but air pollution too.

[–] Impleader@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Great example of how stress ages you

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Not stress, smoking, drinking and no sunscreen does that to you.

I don’t think stress is any less, but actually more than in the 90’s

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nonprophet@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wasn't Tony in his 40's?

Please say Tony was in his 40's!!!

[–] synae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

George Costanza was in his 30s throughout the run of seinfeld

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Tony was 41 per the pilot script but the actor was 38.

AJ is now 41 in 2026.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›