this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
53 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

87956 readers
2800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

How about a clear plan on winning a single fucking downballot election? Oh yeah. That’s not what their job is.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 2 points 30 minutes ago

I'm sure they'll get right on that.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Tall order for democrats to have a clear plan on anything.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

It's kind of a difficult problem to solve.

Effective regulation requires lawmakers to have a solid understanding of the thing being regulated. This is not really feasible with something as complicated and nuanced as "information technology" and it's how you get especially stupid rules like the ones coming into the 3D printer space to prevent manufacturing ghost gun parts.

Guaranteed, those started from a place of "We all agree that a lower barrier of entry to making firearms is bad. How do we control that?"

Theoretically, this is the purpose of a lobby group. You have someone that is familiar with subject matter to propose sensible regulations to keep the industry honest, but in practice it's just industry leaders that pay for regulation to choke out competition, or to loosen restrictions to be more predatory.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

His comments come amidst growing concern around AI safety, particularly after an AI researcher resigned from Anthropic and claimed the leading AI companies are “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.”

love when we uncritically repeat ad copy in our reporting, very nice

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 minutes ago (1 children)

I wonder if future kids will read about the AI panic of the '20s in their hyperbooks

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 minutes ago

Hyperbooks? When I was your age, we called 'em eReaders!

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

If these safeguards are anything like their other safeguards, their plan will be to wait for something bad to happen and then publicly comment that "this bad thing shouldn't be happening" before going back to waiting for the next bad thing to happen.

Seems pretty clear to me.