this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
676 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

55616 readers
159 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Cyberpunk 2077. Video game with Keanu Reeves and Idris Elba basically as themselves, and just the whole scope of the game. And the graphics.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

this even blows my mind from a 2020 nerd perspective.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i might get shade for it, but LLMs.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Nah, in the '70s they expected us to have stuff way better than LLMs by now.

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 13 points 4 days ago

I remember reading in the 80's, can't remember where (this 60's Time-Life book series, maybe? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_Science_Library), where they were discussing the latest advances in training neural nets, and the idea that with a big enough net they could simulate the human brain. Maybe those Time books are on archive.org, I'll have to look for them sometime.

On Wikipedia it seems that research dates back to the 40's, but work was definitely in progress in the 50's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_network_(machine_learning)

So for us old farts, LLMs (even though it's different technology obviously) seem more like "finally" because since Eliza we've been hearing and dreaming about it for ages. Too bad that the reality of them is so dark! And every movie and show tried to warn us: 2001 A Space Odyssey, The Ultimate Computer (Star Trek TOS), TRON, Terminator 2... but we thought "nah, that's just the movies".

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think people generally tend to underestimate technology levels from 50 to 100 years ago. For the most part, the biggest innovation of the last hundred years has been miniaturization rather than any one particular technological advancement. And frankly, I think that’s the answer to the question; People from the 70s wouldn’t necessarily be in awe of one particular technology, but they’d certainly be in awe of how much we’ve been able to fit into a tiny ass amount of space.

Honestly, I think they’d be more disappointed than excited. We have not been to Mars, we don’t have flying cars, and we don’t have computers that can think for themselves despite what LLM providers would have you think. Our 2001 looked nothing like that which was imagined.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

I recently bought a JBL Trio everything in one box music thing.

It has the ability in almost real time, there's a bit of buffering, to unmix any music I stream to it from my phone. You can dial out vocals, the guitar, drums, etc.

Being able to separate the tracks in audio, let alone do it in basically real time, would have seemed like black magic in the 70s. Hell, it seems like black magic now.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

1980's nerd here.

I fly camera drones, sometimes for money. I can buy a DJI mini 3 for under $400 US, and it is capable of taking perfectly steady video and pictures even in a pretty good wind. It will also stay in one spot in midair for close to half an hour before the battery runs down.

And a DJI mini 3 is a cheap beginner camera drone.

[–] pfjarschel@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think the notion of a pocket-sized device that gives you instant access to virtually all the knowledge humanity has ever produced is hard to beat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Could you imagine showing a modern game console to someone from the 70s?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

When I was a child my parents worried that microwave ovens would make their own food toxic, and told me TV would ruin my eyes. Now they sleep with a wireless super computer plugged in to a world wide-network, with a camera and lidar pointed at themselves around the clock.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 15 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Being able to look up and verify just about any fact in seconds via a magical device that fits in your pocket and only needs to be charged once a day, then never using it to do that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Well maybe not crazier than their wildest imaginations since there's Star Wars, Star Trek, etc.
but certainly matching it.

This however, I think anyone from the 1970s would fail to describe what they're looking at first try..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Having a portable device that can play any song you want still blows my mind. I had a Walkman as a kid and thought that was great but being able to listen to anything at the touch of a button is so next level

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›