this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
615 points (99.4% liked)

Open Source

49130 readers
1092 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's September 2026 Pixel Update Bulletin contains patches beyond what's in that month's regular Android Security Bulletin. According to GrapheneOS, some of those extra patches touch standard Android platform code, the kind that runs on non-Pixel devices, not just Pixel-branded hardware.

None of that platform-level code has reached the regular monthly bulletin or the private preview patches other manufacturers typically draw from to get their own patches ready.

And at this rate, these won't reach non-Pixel OEMs at all until Android 17 QPR2 ships later this year in December.

The project is characterizing this as Google "gatekeeping security patches to the standard Android platform code from Android OEMs." The complaints

GrapheneOS says Android 17 QPR1 shipped new developer APIs that never made it into AOSP. This is something they claim hasn't happened since Android's Honeycomb days.

Google's API diff report backs this up. Comparing Android 17 to QPR1 shows one new package, android.hardware.hid, plus changes across sixteen others, including android.media, android.os, android.provider, android.telecom, and android.view.

GrapheneOS has ported its code to QPR1 before Google even released it, but still doesn't have permission to ship that work. For now, the project is backporting Pixel firmware, kernel drivers, userspace drivers, and HALs from QPR1 onto Android 17 instead.

On top of all that, there's a compliance issue that seems to be recurring.

Google was slow to comply with a GPL source request. GrapheneOS requested sources for a build (CD1A.260905.001.A1) on September 1, and access only came through more than two weeks later.

Why this is worrying

None of these three issues is catastrophic by itself. A three-month patch delay, a paused API rollout, a two-week wait on source code—each is the kind of thing that could pass as a one-off.

Taken together, however, they point to a recurring theme. Google is holding security fixes back from the wider Android ecosystem, withholding new APIs from AOSP for the first time in over a decade, and slow-walking GPL compliance it's required to meet.

Don't even get me started on what they are doing to the Android app ecosystem.

Google is on track to require every Android app developer, whether on the Play Store, F-Droid, or anywhere else, to register with them. Come 2027, that means handing over legal identification and signing key evidence before an app can run on any certified device.

Sideloading an unverified app following this would mean enabling developer settings, waiting through a mandatory 24-hour cooldown, and clicking past several warning screens (classic scare tactics, btw).

GrapheneOS is one of dozens of organizations that signed onto the Keep Android Open campaign opposing this, alongside F-Droid, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Free Software Foundation.

If you ask me, this Big Tech company is doing what's regrettably natural for it, clamping down open access to things so that its competition cannot benefit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeftReddit2@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How do we get the average person to care about this? Like okay, as dumb as I am with tech, I probably am more techy than the average layman.

And guess what, they do NOT care about this shit. Most of my non-tech friends still think GrapheneOS is a thing criminals or paranoid schizophrenics use.

They also tend to not care about age verification things. "So what, you show ID at the bar or store to get alcohol, what do I care?"

Like really gamers, how can we make the common person care about this at all? How can we communicate to them it matters and will impact them?

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm picturing the GrapheneOS branded sliding scale spectrum of criminal to paranoid schizophrenic, built into my personal device features.

[–] CaffeinatedCubits@programming.dev 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We really need a better OS than Android.

[–] wry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I keep trying to tell people that Graphene is a dead end. There are other options we should be pursuing.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

This has always been a thought in the back of my head regarding GrapheneOS and why I never bought into the fan hype around it. Google has always been 100% in control of the door letting these AOSP projects function and they have been slowly closing the door for ages now. It will be fully closed at some point.

[–] suvtropics@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're headed a dark direction. One reason I find little interest in android, smartphones, pc building, gaming hobby despite being a tech enthusiast.

[–] boa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

One can buy low powered devices rp, esp32 low budget pc laptop to play and setting up home servers.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Honestly we really need a phone with a proper Linux distro that does have same hardening as Graphene and also underclocks the modem and the rest when idle.

[–] master_baiter@programming.dev 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

google doing as best as it possibly can to turn android into iOS but with none of the benefits

[–] TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml -5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly see it the opposite way. Graphene is doing their level best to turn Android into iOS with none of the benefits.

They’re doing all the stuff apple did for hardware except they can’t make their own so they’re chasing stuff with the security features of iphones, they’re rewriting the system apps to take advantage of those features (like apple did) but they don’t have the benefit of a cloud data system or oversight of their app marketplace.

I use graphene and ios daily. It’s really interesting how they’re going about all this.

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like Apple should just stop being a shitty corporation then, all our problems are solved.

[–] stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

When Sony announced the end of physical disks, a low level exploit for the PS5 was released - to me the timing of this makes the message clear.

I hope we soon have some sort of similar response with Google, whatever that may be.

We are reaching a point where it's evident we need to really start seriously developing open source alternatives for the technology in our life that is essentially gated by duopolies, monopolies, and oligopolies...

Thanks to the auther for publishing important news like this. Spreading the word is so important. Making it understandable to the average person equally so. We need to educate the youth in particular before they become irreversibly entrenched in an even worse tech corpo-dystopia.

Also, if any Grapheneos devs are reading this, I love you guys and I respect the hell outta the work you're putting in. Anyone who has the means and the passion, I'm sure they wouldn't mind a donation or even just feedback and engagement.

[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 109 points 1 day ago (12 children)

We need Proper Linux/BSD phone

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PostmarketOS works pretty decently on certain hardware from my understanding. Apps are lacking, though. I think you might be able to run Android apps through something like Waydroid, but I think certain apps like bank apps don't like that.

[–] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah I mean with Posh based on kde based but with native Linux app ecosystem.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

The writing has been on the wall for years now [Article from 2018]

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 216 points 2 days ago

It's called installing apps, not "sideloading". Installing your programmes into a device you own is normal, being blocked from doing that is abnormal.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Ramp up Motorola then.

[–] story@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm team graphene despite having returned to the cathedral. they need thousands of dollars of our money to free up their time for the things they prioritize: this is very much a theo de raadt situation. the phone landscape is imperfect, we must take what we can get, whatever is maximum security and maintains the free software principles, projects like Android ports of self-hosted clients must continue to poison the Google narrative. it is the job of the less-skilled to serve as patron for the people who hold up the internet

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This was already the inevitability of Android; Google was just willing to spend 15-20 years to achieve as much market dominance as possible. They fought off Palm webOS, Windows Mobile, Linux phones are just now materializing, iOS is huge but having one major competitor isn’t a problem. Now that “the reality of the world means more security is needed” Google will work their way out of any openness they once had. Perhaps even someday their own hardware will be the only game in town. They’re already by FAR the worst company when it comes to harvesting data and profiling you.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It's called embrace, extend, extinguish.
Microsoft pioneered it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Google is on track to require every Android app developer, whether on the Play Store, F-Droid, or anywhere else, to register with them. Come 2027, that means handing over legal identification and signing key evidence before an app can run on any certified device.

When is some country's government finally going to grow a pair and block this shit on the grounds of antitrust law?

[–] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most governments are fascists. They want what Google is working towards: a certified device. Once you have a platform that the majority owns and is certified you can start rolling out more fascist policies, like identity verification for asinine things. The American courts failed a long time ago in regards to software with Microsoft. You could make cases against Google decades ago, but literally no one cares for some reason.

[–] username123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Complacency is stupidity.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] qonqe@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Spain??? Absolutely not. In fact, the new EU "Digital ID App" is going to require having a "Google or Apple verified device" for it to work. They are all in favour of restricting the internet behind IDs. Spanish President openly talked about abolishing anonymity to "protect us". And the opposition is even worse.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

The EU digital act is not Spain's digital act. Regardless, being pro-Palestine and anti-NATO doesn't necessarily make Sanchez tech-savy.

Only when they stop getting some kind of benefit from it.

[–] DutchJ@lemmy.zip 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Honestly, I am running GrapheneOS (o7 to the devs, btw) until my Pixel 6a dies, and then I am switching to Jolla + SailfishOS. There is nothing more maddening to me than seeing Microslop and Google slowly filling their ecosystem with irremovable invasive bloatware and basically blocking a free market.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If you don't already have the Jolla hardware, I'd consider getting a Fairphone 6 or 6+ instead and using TheMightyCat's build of postmarketOS. They've been doing some insane work with hardware enablement on the close-to-mainline kernel for that phone to the point where it's almost 100% fully functional.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›