That's the end of me flying. The wife and I will now take extra days, get a rental and have us a road trip
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Is this an LLM style AI, or a machine learning AI.
If it's a LLM, it's not worth a penny
If it's a true machine learning AI, then I can see the worth of it.
AI is indeed to blame - but not like you think.
Trump's ChatGPT prompt after translation into natural language: I want to kill some sand people for fun and giggles. Which country did fight back the least in the past against aerial attacks?
Hi Claude, How do I test my backup fiber link so I won't find out it's down when the primary is cut?
I can't see a single thing that could go wrong with this.
My initial reaction was "well that's gonna end badly". But then I realised they are probably not talking about generative AI. ML approaches can be pretty useful for optimisation, so this might not be as bad as it sounds. Really depends on what the actual technology is and what purpose it's being put to..
Nope, I'm almost certain they mean the same LLMs they use for anything else. If they are using grok in intelligence and military you think they won't for this?
What are you basing that on? The article has some open speculation, but says it's not known.
LLMs make no sense in this context. It's not like they're writing a report every time a plane comes in to land
Hopefully there are others who can speak with more knowledge on this.
Isn't one of the problems that aircraft don't have consistent, modern transponders so that they can be reliably seen by the towers? I think that was part of the DC crash between passenger plane and helicopter, no? ATC didn't have good visibility of the helicopter, so they told the plane and the helicopter to just watch out for each other visually.
I don't see AI helping all that much until all aircraft are retrofitted with modern transponders.
ATC could see both of them no problem, but ATC is often overloaded and will pawn off responsibility to the pilots to maintain separation.
Legally speaking, the controller in that accident did their job correctly. The helicopter pilots assured the controller multiple times that they would pass behind the jet.
The current hot topic is ADSB IN. Most aircraft are required to have ADSB OUT these days, but very few aircraft (especially airliners) have recievers to display that info.
It's direct, line of site communication from aircraft to aircraft. Exact position in relation to each other, right on your nav display.
My understanding is that it's an upgrade to the current situational awareness provided by TCAS. TCAS is wonderful but broke down in the DCA crash because [I don't remember the real reason so I'd just be guessing here]. TCAS should have saved the day, but there was something missing (probably the helicopter transponder wasn't "participating" in the TCAS conversation that airplanes usually have (the TCAS computers, not the pilots)).
Would ADSB IN have helped prevent DCA? Yes, assuming the helicopter had it they would have had better situational awareness. If the helicopter had their transponder turned off, though, it's not clear to me if they would be broadcasting ADSB for the airliner to see.