this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
868 points (99.2% liked)

Funny

16257 readers
2090 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I like LLMs and also the research but I think we're at a point where one could make a pause, turn the models into silicone and sell them as hardware for people who are actually interested.

That would solve all privacy problems, eliminate many data centers, subscription fees, internet dependencies and allow for slower and more thoughtful upgrades (hardware isn't updated as often as software). That would be a pretty sovereign solution.

However, from a company perspective they can't force it on everyone anymore, don't get all the juicy data from all the users and can't sell subscriptions any more and change everything on their side.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

turn the models into silicone

The models are data, and silicone is rubber. So... I don't know what you're proposing here.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

That would be lovely

[–] m532@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Capitalists: Noo its bad, see, it doesn't make profit

Communists: Free AI for everyone

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago

Yay, free pollution for everyone!

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

looking forward to looting RAM and GPUs for our community library organized communist LLM

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Waiter, please bring me 1,000 of your finest shares of WinRAR! I'm going to be rich, I tell you! Quite!

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They'll reclassify it as a necessary utility like water or power and tax more subsidies for paying billionaires even more from public coffers before admitting it's mostly just search engines & corporate social media eating their own tail.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

This is why I think the bubble will last a lot longer than some people think. The heads of the tech firms have such a tight relationship with the GOP, and even a somewhat tight relationship with the Democrats that it's almost certainly going to be declared "too big to fail" or "too critical to fail".

The fact that it's being used by the military just makes that even more likely. The firms will declare that if they go bankrupt, the military will be crippled -- despite the fact that the military ran just fine without "AI" just 5 years ago.

So, when the economics of the situation show how absurd this bubble is, the collapse won't happen because the firms will be propped up by the US government. That will put every taxpayer on the hook for the billions and billions of debt these firms took on. So, Andreessen Horowitz and the Saudis will be bailed out by the taxpayers who have been fighting datacenters.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

“I remember once my father and I were walking down Fifth Avenue and there was a homeless person sitting right outside of Trump Tower and I remember my father pointing to him and saying, ‘You know, that guy has $8 billion more than me,’ because he was in such extreme debt at that point, you know?”

~ Ivanka Trump

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe that Trump is capable of such introspection.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Believe it or not, Trump's become dumber with age.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 63 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

Your local grocery store is more profitable than OpenAI. In fact you are more profitable than OpenAI.

OpenAI owes hundreds of billions of dollars, with a revenue a fraction of that. They will never become profitable.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

They will never become profitable.

If you look at OpenAI as a single, independent, private company then they appear unprofitable. But when you look at them as a means of laundering Pentagon money and other federal contracts into straw purchases for NVIDIA and Oracle, they are immensely profitable.

AI is a Loss Leader. It props up the production and sale of hardware, which has been fruitful for its partners, its investors, and the economy as a whole. It is a digital form of induced demand in so far as new construction creates a "virtuous" cycle of increasing consumption, as more and more of the business and public sector is dragged into its orbit.

The end-game for OpenAI is to have a captured market of businesses and government institutions. Whole sectors of the economy devoid of human knowledge workers who are hopelessly addicted to AI Agent processes, because nobody managing the companies actually know what these agents are doing anymore. At this point, Altman and Amodei can charge whatever they damned well please for token traffic, because there's no bureaucracy capable of competing with them.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the money getting funneled to Nvidia came from them in the first place. That's why they're one of the chatbot's biggest cheerleaders.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Most of the money getting funneled to Nvidia came from them in the first place.

NVIDIA's not getting most of its money from OpenAI. OpenAI doesn't really buy anything from NVIDIA. They buy rack space from Oracle, which then builds out new datacenters with NVIDIA chipsets. And Oracle's primary revenue stream is from its business Cloud Services, of which OpenAI is a small fraction.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This would make sense if they were the only game in town , but they very much…aren’t.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Keeping foreign technology out of the reach of US consumers has been a big part of Trump/Biden/Trump-Era tech policy.

And as hardware prices skyrocket, access to compute approaches a monopoly position.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The Weimar Republic was more profitable... well no, maybe not. But you get the sentiment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, you joke. But Germany pivoted out of the Great Depression far faster than its European peers precisely because they weren't afraid to print a bunch of money and pay people to do things.

The Fascists inherited one of the only recovering economies in Europe by the time they took power in 1932. And when they assumed office, they brought investment from the Americans overseas (who were having their own fascist turn), because they were willing to purge or enslave local populations, tear down neighborhoods, and build up whatever capital Standard Oil, IBM, and Ford Motor Company asked of them.

On the opposite side of the Atlantic and on the other side of the Urals, progressive liberals and Soviet communists were trying out a leftist mirror of this strategy. They were using the levers of the state to mobilize the masses of unemployed labor into productive capital improvements for the benefit of the public at-large. So the US, Germany, Japan, and the USSR all rapidly emerged out of the '29 crash into a booming 1930s economy. Meanwhile, England and France and much of Latin America and North Africa languished under artificial constraints of state-capitalism.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Why does that feel forebodingly familiar

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I mean, we'll jump to 1930s on reflex. But this is a pattern that's repeated itself internationally, from Apartheid South Africa to the juntas in the Pacific Rim to Fascists in Argentina and Chile.

Economy shits itself. Social Democrats come in to deliver milquetoast reforms. The economy recovers somewhat, but never enough to actually relieve the social pressures of the moment. And then the democratic system starts vomiting up radical candidates of all stripes, while bourgeois capital attempts to ride the tiger into the next full recovery and/or national emergency.

The wheel of fortune doesn't always land on Fascism. But it's definitely a possibility.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They made trillions of marks, so yes they were extremely profitable.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I like that they never lost their gusto with the designs of the bills lol

Like they had to know that their currency was basically dead, yet they still made sure that those 100 billion Mark notes looked classy as fuck.

If/when the modern US makes it to this point, I can't imagine them putting all that much effort into making our $100 billion dollar bills look cool.

They'll probably have fucking Steve Bannon's face on them.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

The person designing them had to make them pretty because they knew they were going to be paid in them

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] raven55six@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

That is so true, bringing $40 Billion a year with about $80 Billion as expenses makes OpenAI indeed in a red zone. They should consider shutting down so that we can have some level of relief from AI slop.

[–] kurt_vonnegut2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

So you're saying we should be pumping all our savings and pension money in WinRar?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

I wonder what will happen in 2027 when those repayments come due.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Squeeze the working class.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That won't pay off the several hundred billion they owe.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

That's for governments to figure out.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

They'll pay off the old loans with new loans disguised as investments between all the major AI players.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They will get an extension based on lies about ai genocide or something.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

From who? Not really an option. If OpenAI can't pay it's bills in 2027-28, it will end Oracle & Softbank.

Softbank is so over-leveraged, it should be illegal.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The government will buy a stake to both pay billionaires more from collected taxes and control what information can be generated and making the spy apparatus backdoors tracking every question or command part of the official platforms.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'll bet you $$$ right now that won't happen. First of all, they still won't be profitable. Second of all it's easy to just completely avoid interacting with LLMs.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

If AI could really make your business so much more efficient that it makes up for the cost of paying for AI... Why doesn't Google just run your business themselves? They could make even more money than you do.

[–] chrisashtear@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Theyd probably try to use gemini, and it would either spin in circles or delete their production databases

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 24 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I was finally starting to save up money in a 401k for retirement. Then I got fired. Now the AI bubble is going to burst and nuke what little money is in my 401k. FML.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I’m trying to stick with it, and not pull a bunch of money out. If this is all just insider trading back and forth, my hope is it will recover over time and level out. (As that will be in the interest of the manipulators too.)

If it’s just a big crash, like 1929 style, then I figure we’re all fucked whether you have stocks or dollar bills or CDs or doubloons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

You should roll over your 401K to investments you believe in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›