this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
519 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

88221 readers
3345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

EA did this years ago

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully they don’t license this patent out so it’s really easy to avoid

[–] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was just thinking about that. I can't imagine Microsoft licencing it cheaply, so I would think other companies would be losing money over this.

If anything, Microsoft made us a favour. (As long as they won't continue their journey becoming Disney of gaming, I guess sigh)

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They'd likely license as a percentage of revenue, not a specific dollar amount, which would make it more available to every studio and they'd theoretically make more money from the added ad revenue.

[–] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Oh yes, I would imagine so. I just think that certain percentage of their potential customers will be turned away by it and so overall good chunk of the extra money they would get from the ads to balance out loss of sales would end up going to Microsoft instead.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

Drinks a verification can

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who's got that copy-pasta about drinking verification cans to play their games? I think that fits here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I'd patent my well-honed technique for not playing Microsoft games but I want to share it with the world, free of charge.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Micro$oft will be the next Google advertising company, with a browser & software as it's side hustle. Advertising is a cancer.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

they are going to lock boss, and quests behind AD play time, no doubt.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Planetside 1 did this 20 years ago. There were screens in the waiting rooms for the shuttle in each faction's sanctuary world where they would play real-world commercials while you wait. Hard to find any info on it, it was so long ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

at least this hopefully means this is limited to microsoft's games, which arent that worthwhile in the first place

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That’s So Microsoft!™

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

"… while you're playing them." — that's ambitious at this point.

Fuck yeah, this is going to save some serious time. Will cut down the non video game ad watching time I need to do by a lot probably.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Good call on their part. Wouldn't want anyone to steal their dog shit idea.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Gamepass lower tier with ads - when?

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oooo, that happens and I'd make it a point to contact the manufacturer/creator of said advertised product or service and politely inform them that because of the interruption of MY TIME, while relxing in a game, I will now never, ever consider their company, goods or services.

Make it formal, concise and final and if possible send it to the CEO. You want that one to come down on the head of whomever decided to insert themselves into a player's game - get them in trouble with the boss - with a vengeance.

It often works.

[–] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I agree people should oppose this, I really don't think the head of Microsoft gaming decision or the current Microsoft CEO would care about your letter and most likely it wouldn't even reach them.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they mean if the advertised product. So like if Kleenex buys the ad space they'll let kleenex know they're boycotting them and why, not Microsoft.

[–] bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Oh you're completely right. I misread it the first time. 🙂

New Activision halo is going to make a game with QTEs where you have to eat a dorito or drink mt dew.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Fuck Microsoft.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

"Loading a gif at runtime" wow, such innovation.

Pretty sure Gates of Galoo has prior art too

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

such periodic breaks can be placed at a variety of predictable times in the content without adversely affecting the user experience,” the Microsoft patent declares.

The experience is very much affected I would say... But that's only me...

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

You guys do know a patent isn't a declaration to implement it?

Like you know that Sony TV ad patent that gets brought up every now and then as "The dystopian future of watching TV". Yeah that was in 2009.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

As if I wasn’t already interested in the Xbox.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›