this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2026
331 points (81.6% liked)

Technology

88272 readers
2644 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow. I'm impressed... Loads of comments and no one had to chime in and say "Arch is the best" πŸ˜‚

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Arch is as lightweight or heavy as you want it to be. Except for the Systemd stack, that locks you a bit in. That's where Artix comes into play.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You are all falling for the rage bait

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same for you.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, why not? Isn’t that the whole point of the internet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bold_omi@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago

Neither have ever been lightweight.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago

More like Ubuntu was the beginner friendly distro and Mint has taken that place years ago, right?

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe Xubuntu or preferably Lubuntu, but never Ubuntu.

I'd even have a hard time saying Linux Mint is going to be lightweight.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lubuntu definitely seems about the lightest weight desktop environment for it for sure. I suppose Ubuntu server can be pretty light... But so are most linux servers, that's kind of their selling point.

I'd argue AntiX or PuppyLinux... but if we're talking about stuff a normie can just use, I agree with you.

DietPi (headless) is ~ 300mb fully resident in memory.

https://dietpi.com/

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

You can tell the author hasn’t spent much time in the Linux world.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

Unless they're comparing to LMDE, they're mostly similar about being lightweight.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Ubuntu was never a lightweight distro lol

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

I mainly use Mint as my desktop distro, but it’s not lightweight, it’s batteries included. If lightweight is what you want, there are better options.

[–] 2pNza@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

clear debian is the solution

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] llama@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use xubuntu just because I like xfce better

Ubuntu used to be even more demanding with Unity. I love Mint though. Been installing it a lot lately

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope. Ubuntu is a lightweight distro. If one wants to call it a Linux at all. I freshly installed Kubuntu 26.04 a few days ago "with everything", but that did not even include a gcc.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

Not light weight. Also not Ubuntu.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any Linux distribution based on KDE or GNOME is not going to be lightweight. It did have the LXDE option for stripping it back somewhat, but the repos were still mostly filled with software that requires KDE or GNOME.

Mint is kind of like LxUbuntu back in the early days; still no lightweight, not even by desktop standards, but it’ll bloat up quickly if you want to get anything done with it.

I mean, Puppy Linux and DSL are still around. Anything based on Debian could claim to be stable or enterprise ready, but not lightweight.

[–] pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like this was true maybe 10-20 years ago, but any semi-recent desktop or laptop can run KDE or Gnome fine. If you are running an SBC with limited RAM, then maybe you should look at another desktop GUI.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any semi-recent desktop or laptop has no need of a lightweight Linux. That’s for embedded solutions, rPis, and other resource constrained systems.

Having said that, in 2026 and going forward, we may have need of lightweight desktop distributions again. 64GB storage, 4GB RAM style.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί