this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
481 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

73066 readers
2223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This isn't even weird.

I think most security experts would recommend that you have your most important passwords written down somewhere, and then hopefully locked up in some safe or deposit box somewhere. You don't need to buy an entire book for it, but some people like to spend money.

If this is for your less important passwords, then for the most part, writing them down is actually better. You won't be as tempted to reuse your banking password for your social media. And some people like writing things down. A password manager is a better solution, but lots of people aren't as good with technology and if they even let the browser remember it, they won't know how to retrieve it later if they want to use a different computer, for example.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I have a letter in my safe in the event of my death that contains all my passwords and accounts. I have also slipped in a dead man switch that she's unaware of that will wipe out my "collection of science".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

I'd rather people use this than reuse the same password everywhere.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

That’s exactly what I use. Chances of my house getting robbed is small. Chances of yet another data breach is very high - this year my data was breached at least 2ce that I remember.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 13 points 3 days ago

I would trust it more than the biometric payment method they’re pushing in Whole Foods

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Im guilty of this. I dont write out the passwords in plaintext though. Its mostly just a few letters to remind me of which version of my many "master" passwords i used and then asterisks. ~PW0****$~ kinda thing. I know its bad but I can't bring myself to trust a password manager.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 10 points 3 days ago

If you keep the book secure, it's probably safer than any computer based record system - right up until someone untrustworthy gets their eyes on the book.

With a physical book, you can store it in a safe deposit box when you don't need access, make partial copies, copies take (everyone, bad guys and good) significantly longer to make even with a photocopy process... most importantly, people intuitively understand the vulnerabilities of a physical book.

Now, the physical book won't stop keyloggers...

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My master password is physically present as a mnemonic device, but not available digitally. Anywhere.

Beyond that I really cannot recommend this book: You need to be able & willing to type your passwords out, which means simpler and shorter passwords. I use 99 character complete random ASCII-strings by default. Try typing that in even once.

But there's a different, unspoken criticism here: don't store your database on a 3rd party server, a.k.a. "The Cloud". I use KeepassXC btw. - and my very own "cloud".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›