this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
78 points (81.0% liked)

Privacy

51283 readers
122 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Old man alert. Nerd alert. EXTREME snoozefest alert. You've been warned, continue reading at your own peril!

originally posted in /c/technology but was removed quickly, presumably because it's not considered a tech article or news. This is probably the better fit anyhow

For those who aren't familiar with the Brave browser, its history and controversies, or Gecko engine vs. Chromium engine (and loosely, Webkit), it's probably worth reading up on first. I'm writing this with the assumption that you know all of this stuff, because otherwise this post would be an even longer novel than it already is.

Brave recently released a paid version of their browser called Brave Origin which strips out a bunch of "features" like web3, AI, crypto, telemetry, etc.

It has a dedicated installer separate from the normal browser, except on mobile where the features can be batch disabled after verifying your license. You can also do it that way on the desktop version if you want to. Apparently a standalone android Origin app may be in the works, and the licensing system does seem to be relatively privacy preserving and not overly restrictive.

It's pretty damn expensive (except for Linux where it's free). And I must say that I feel like an outlier, because I strongly approve of this release and the direction I'm seeing the company take.

Let me state these right now:

  • Brave's controversies are real and they were completely unacceptable and they are a permanent mark on their reputation. It's no wonder many distrust them.
  • I'm fully aware that this still indirectly utilizes Google's work, and that Google creates open source projects, pumps a ton of money into them, gets a ton of contributers on board, and then starts introducing proprietary blobs which handicaps competition while effectively squeezing free work and investment out of others.
  • I love FOSS with all my heart.
  • I could add a bunch of disclaimers but I'll address them if I see something in the comments.

In a perfect world I would hate Brave's decision. In our current reality I think it's about the best move they could've made as a for-profit company outside of just creating their own browser engine. But there's a reason there are so few options for engines right now, and it's because it's really fucking complex to make one and it takes a fuckload of time, money, and resources. When somebody develops a genuine engine contender, I'll need to circle back.

Many of us use Firefox (or FF fork) with extensions. Many use ungoogled Chromium or other Chromoum forks. Obviously totally fine.

But there's a few issues with the current browser space, as I see them.

First is that the reality is, much of the web now treats Chrome (rather, the Chromium engine) as a first-class citizen. Some sites run significantly faster or more reliably on Chromium. Some sites require Chromium to fully function. For example, want to use the GrapheneOS web installer? You need a Chromium-based browser. Chromium has lots of features under the hood that the modern web utilizes. If this has never been a consideration for you, then this particular point is moot.

Second is that data harvesting and tracking is becoming wayyy more advanced than even some techies might know about - and let's be real, it's becoming pretty fucking exhausting to keep up with the growing pile of bullshit being thrown our way. It's also becoming harder and harder to stop. In both Gecko and Chromium you can, to varying degrees, install extensions, use browser forks, adjust settings, etc. to prevent much or even all of this. But the absolutely unfathomable amount of money being poured into violating your privacy needs hard, sustained, expensive work to fight in meaningful and new ways. One recent example I read about is brave implementing a new GPU anti-fingerprinting measure which is something I hadn't even considered before.

Third is that the Internet of today is just straight-up busted. Yes there are super cool projects in the works such as I2P that are trying to change that. But they're not reaching mass adoption any time soon. Most people can't even bother trying to leave for places like Lemmy and that's much less friction than I2P. I absolutely am not defeatist, and I fight this shit like the plague it is, but we also need to live our lives.

Fourth is that the way we use the internet varies. There's a lot of things we could do to make sure we're always maximally protected, but usually we find a balance. Stuff we daily drive, stuff we use when there's a specific need, stuff we're forced to use. If you're hardcore enough to do things to the max at all times then you don't even need to read this - you can browse in Mullvad Browser with (or without) a VPN or the Tor Browser, and supplement with OS and hardware privacy measures, etc... and you're likely better protected for it. But for me, and I suspect for many others, in typical daily use we want the right balance of speed, usability, privacy, and security.

Those "features" that brave bundles in are really shitty. But the mass market time and time again shows they'll put up with a lot of bullshit. And for most people you can just manually toggle the majority of these things off in the main browser for free, and it doesn't take more than a few minutes. These features, like it or not, pull in a lot more money than what most non-profits get when solely relying on donations. Hell, one of the huge things keeping Firefox propped up is their search engine deal with Google, not the donations.

Brave, like it or not, does provide some pretty compelling value in other places. First and foremost it's good to see people seeking out alternatives to Chrome for literally any reason. But they are admittedly super on-top of their Ad-blocking, anti-fingerprinting, other privacy features (like the shred tab button), and update cadence. They're the closest thing to a well-funded Chrome competitor that, unfortunately for our reality, runs on Chromium.

I get that it feels wrong to pay to remove features from your browser. But you know what, I'm sick of the micro transaction ad filled privacy invading bulls hit joke of an economy the internet has accepted at large. If it were up to me I would bring back freeware and shareware. Brave is the modern day WinRAR in an alternate universe where 7zip wasn't invented yet and the built in unzip still didn't support other formats.

I'm going to continue using my Gecko based browsers as I always have. But for when I want or need something from Chromium, I think Brave Origin is my new go-to. For me that's when I need certain hardware integration or I'm on a specific site, and chromium in my experience works very well with Android. One other thing I learned which to me is a definite plus, is that it was developed by the Ex-Ceo of Mozilla and creator of JavaScript (that was cool to learn, and that's one guy btw, not two).

For those who think this I'm suspiciously positive about Brave, I get it. I literally thought of brave as spyware until I read about Brave Origin. I think it's a sincere effort to correct course in a way that let's them operate at the level they need to maintain their product. For most people reading this who feel like trying Brave, they should just spend 5 minutes adjusting the browser settings. If you're clinically insane like me, and you actually resonated with this post, then maybe try it. And if you wanna buy it and chargeback or find a torrent or whatever, I don't really care.

I suppose this post is solely about Brave if we lived in a vacuum. But actually I think it's about sharing a mindset which I think can help the internet improve just a little bit, Brave or not.

Finally, let me end on a tangent about Alphabet Inc., mostly Google. That company is full of very smart ~~sociopaths~~ people who grabbed the internet by its collective ballsack, and while it may have felt good for a minute, they started squeezing them until you forgot what it feels like to have your balls flapping in the wind again. They made AOSP and then fucked us. They made Chromium and then fucked us. They did the heavy lifting for RCS and then fucked us. Google fucking sucks. And RIP to the word 'googol', you were robbed.

Honourable Webkit mention for Orion browser, and also their search engine Kagi which I fucking ADORE!

Tl;dr Brave Origin is alright, maybe try it, or don't.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nkk@programming.dev 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Chromium-based browsers that are better than Brave:

Desktop - Helium

Android (GrapheneOS) - Vanadium

Android (Not GrapheneOS) - Titanium

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I read on the GrapheneOS forums that Cromite lags behind on updates and that Titanium is better

[–] nkk@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

Never heard of Titanium, thanks!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have tinkered with Orion. It has a lot of promise, but it is still a bit buggy. I’m all Firefox since before it was Firefox, but I respect your assessment. I’m also looking forward to Ladybird, even though it also has its fair share of controversy.

Recent Firefox has been really good to me. Vertical tabs and new design are excellent; though I don’t seem to be with the crowd in that.

One small feedback that is meant less as a correction and more in case people are curious. Chromium isn’t an engine, it is an open source browser. The Gecko / WebKit equivalent here is Blink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It was removed from /c/technology because /c/technology isn't for discussing, learning about, or posting about technology. It's for posting about big tech companies, tech adjacent or non-tech news, politics, and their CEOs.

It's the Lemmy equivalent of reddits. It's pretty much a pile of crap.

[–] enchantedgoldapple@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Appreciate your post very much. I used to use Brave as my primary browser a few years back but Lemmy basically guilt-tripped me into ditching it for Firefox even though it was working perfectly fine for me. Although now I have naturally grown accustomed to Firefox forks for my daily use, it's nice to see that I'll have another viable alternative if I ever need a Chromium browser.

[–] stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm happy to hear you appreciated it, thanks.

I get it, it's hard to broach a controversial topic or a nuanced topic online sometimes without things exploding in your face.

Lemmy seems pretty decent for giving these topics a chance if you make a sincere case and you cover your bases.

Even still it's not a guarantee. Honestly the most freeing advice (that I'm gonna give and that you didn't ask for) is to speak your mind if you wanna speak your mind. Recognizing that we're all different, that many arguments boil down to opinion, and that the up votes and down votes can't affect you - it's quite freeing.

Anyhow yeah I'd say use it if you wanna use it but I strongly recommend disabling all the shit that is there just to generate money at the very least.

[–] yestalgia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I was using a Gecko based browser on GrapheneOS until I recently learned that all of the frequent stuttering when scrolling that I was tolerating for months was related to the browser being anything besides chromium based!

So I'm back on Brave for my main browser across platforms even though I was wanting to support the open web with a Gecko browser.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ironfox on my GOS takes about 1-2 minutes to load a webpage. Even with a fresh install and no mods done to UBO. That's longer than Tor browser takes to load the same page. No joke, I timed several pages with a stopwatch.

Until Ironfox gets their stuff together, I'll be using Brave.

Edit: Seems Ironfox's slowness is due to their DNS resolver. I turned that off and it's quick. Later today, I'm installing another profile in Librewolf so I can sync with Ironfox and ditching Brave on my Android.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Having a real hard time believing this. I can't tell the difference between the one that ships with graphene or ironfox in terms of pages loading.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I am a Firefox & forks diehard, but I need a Chromium/Webkit/Whatever based browser for a lot of corporate shit I have to access. So, I bit the bullet and bought Brave Origin. It doesn't suck. I wouldn't pick it as my main, but it's fine. Much better option than Chrome and Edge, that's for certain.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First thing I tried. I often get a message that it isn't supported.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's just because Brave tells websites that you're using Chrome.

All http requests include a "user agent" where the requester tells the server what agent the user is using. requesters can specify whatever they want - it's not complex to tell the server you're using tea leaves to render the server's response.

Some web pages are designed to tell the user that their browser is not compatible, if it doesn't match a set of compatible browsers. So if you say you're rendering the page with "tea leaves" it will tell you it's not compatible because it doesn't match "chrome" or "edge" or whatever.

The outcome is - these alerts are rudimentary and not actually considering the capabilities of your browser.

I generally use librewolf but as you say some pages are just broken, so I use ungoogled chromium for those pages.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know what user agent is, and that isn't the problem. These are web apps, and they aren't responding with a "browser not supported" error. They just either do not work, or do not work correctly. I main Librewolf and Firefox (dependent on system). All I ever use Brave Origin (Chrome and Edge before it), is to access a very small set of corporate apps I seldom use. I could spend my valuable time trying to get Chromium to work if it was going to be my main, but in this case it was just way easier to buy Brave Origin and expense it to the client that did not support Firefox.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I often get a message that it isn’t supported.

Sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Totally valid use. Why is it that so many employers seem to have some system in place that somehow requires Chrome. Happened to me in the past as well.

[–] eldyaitch@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Sad the internet trolls need so many disclaimers. For example:

  • I don’t really like tofu.

I appreciate your post because I switched to Brave maybe 5+ years ago and have been very pleased. I knew of Brave origin, but I had no idea it was free for Linux?! Super good news for me then. The first thing I do on a fresh Brave install is disable all of it’s creature comforts and crypto. By the time I’m done tweaking every setting, it’s as if my browser has short-term memory loss just the way I like it. I don’t need it to remember. I have extensions and bookmarks for things I want to keep track of. For this, Brave has allowed me to say “No” in all the ways other browsers weren’t.

[–] stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Yep I don't really like putting disclaimers either but the trust level on the internet is most definitely the lowest it has ever been.

Wow so you've been on that Brave train for a while, huh? And yeah that Linux move is actually part of what made me think they're being sincere in their efforts. They probably know the Linux crowd isn't putting up with bullshit. I use Linux too and I still bought it because I do use other platforms and I'm at the point where I'm voting hard with my wallet, sometimes to my own detriment lol

"Short term memory loss" is a good way to put that feature and I really love it. I wish there was a way to exclude certain sites from that though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't have a problem with Origin, since Firefox stripped of telemetry, ai, and sponsorships is something I'd be happy to pay a one time fee for even if I can disable it.

Having everything stripped from the installer by default from the official source is nice, and lot of projects don't get funding from most users. So offering something like this seems fine with me.

[–] begrudgedcarfolk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You don't have to pay for any of that, it's free with LibreWolf on desktop and IronFox on Android.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use LibreWolf on desktop but Ironfox is far too slow on GrapheneOS.

[–] begrudgedcarfolk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just picked up a used Pixel and I've has no issues with IronFox, my partner uses it too. Did you forget to install the adblocker? Maybe enough time has passed since you last used it and it's gotten better since then?

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

UBO was installed. Last time I tried Ironfox was perhaps two weeks ago.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

It is extremely laggy. But I have a 2017 redmi 4x with a SDM 435 and 4GB of ram (also lags on 690), so it's probably fine on anything with a SDM 855+.

If I remember, I might post an update on how it works on a SDM 8 elite.

[–] steelplatedmech@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Still would be nice to have an option straight from Firefox available.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Brave is not perfect but it does objectively have some privacy features that other browsers simply don't. Like syncing devices with a passphrase (no account), and it's also the only browser I'm aware of that has and continues to develop browser fingerprinting protections.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't Firefox have fingerprinting protections which are disabled by default? LibreWolf enables them by default.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

A lot of them claim this but I'm yet to see it. Most "fingerprinting protections" involve just having everyone using the same stats and trying to blend in. Brave does this by randomization instead, which is far more effective. They also just released GPU randomization. Orion claims to this day that fingerprinting resistance is impossible, which is preposterous because Brave is doing it today.

https://brave.com/privacy-updates/38-webgl-webgpu-fingerprinting-protections/

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miadidi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was using Firefox for 5 years and lately since few months, sites load terribly slower than on Brave Origin or Vanilla Chromium in Arch Linux for me atleast. A website that loads instantly on Brave takes like 5-10s on Firefox.

I tried reinstalling Firefox, tried a very fresh install w/o any extensions or my bookmarks but it still felt very slow on two different devices and networks as well. Tried disabling ipv6—which improved the loading speeds by about 1-2s. But then I pulled the plug and completely switched to Brave Origin. TBH I love it. It's snappy AF. Has none of Vanilla Bravd BS and has an adblocker as strong UBO.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where do you find websites that takes 5-10 seconds for you to load on Firefox?
Neither of the news sites, forums or self-hosted webuis I use take close to that. Even when I set disable caching and reload something heavy like the steam storepage I can't get the browser to take 5 seconds to load it in.

How do you feel about being a part of giving Google control over the whole browser ecosystem by using a Chromium based browser?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›