this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
99 points (97.1% liked)

Programming

28702 readers
426 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notptr@lemmy.cyberia9.org 3 points 9 hours ago

Awww great my database is 2.5D.........

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 31 points 15 hours ago

“My pistol will perform a SELECT query on a bullet and then use it to perform an INSERT INTO query on your head and truncate your life, you denormalized villain!”

(from review of Gore: Ultimate Soldier by Taylor Bell, 2002)

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"An SQL" makes me unreasonably angry, but that's pretty awesome

[–] gastroglizzy@piefed.social 18 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Not everyone calls it "sequel" https://learnsql.com/blog/sql-or-sequel/

If you want to be really pedantic, you could argue that Server Query Language (SQL) and Server English QUEry Language (SEQUEL) refers to two different things.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

FYI, SQL = Structured Query Language, not Server Query Language.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's always fun to get a glimpse into how other people pronounce things with their usage of A vs AN. My favorite example is people who say "an historic".

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If you go by the Greek origin of the word (ιστορία), that's more correct. Correcter, if you will.

[–] degen@midwest.social 3 points 12 hours ago

We should just stop naming things tbh

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Some people pronounce Graphics Interchange Format Jiff. It does not make it right or social acceptable.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

The year is 2839939. The last GIF vs JIF joke is made. The sun explodes, killing everyone, and ridding the universe of the joke forever.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Some of us say hard g GIF, but prefer "ess-cue-ell" for SQL.

The former is an acronym and the latter is an initialism, and for me, that's what makes the distinction. Anything else is secondary.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Oddly, I usually say "ess-cue-ell" but read it as sequel while reading the acronym in your first sentence.

[–] log@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

You say es-cue-ell.
I say squeal.

We are not the same.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago

"Suckle" would be my preferred horrific reading.

For reasons I won't go into, and probably not the first ones you'd think of, "squeal" holds a different negative connotation for me.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

Choosey developers choose gif (jiff). It was deliberately meant to evoke the peanut butter ad.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I used to like doing interviews where I had the person (collaboratively) code conways game of life in SQL.

You don’t need to recursively write it. But seeing they understand how to translate logic into table based entries, do basic DML via updates (or I had a no dml template that just used the query results), using window functions and aggregates, case when’s, etc. gave a very good overview of their understanding of sql across a lot of features.

I provided the skeleton and the rules, and I’d help them through it. The goal was that it was fun and not horribly stressful, I made it clear I’d provide any answers to questions or functions or syntax they needed (because IRL they’d just google, so I’ll save them the time).

I think most candidates had fun with it.

[–] cm0002@toast.ooo 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I made it clear I’d provide any answers to questions or functions or syntax they needed (because IRL they’d just google, so I’ll save them the time).

That right there is the difference between a shit interviewer and a golden interviewer. And that goes for a lot of technical roles, far too many just throw a "whiteboard" at you and just expect you to figure it out without any outside help, even though it goes against how even experts get things done in the real world :/

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There’s nothing worse than killing all momentum and dialogue while you wait for someone stressed out to waste 5 minutes google something and find the right documentation page. It just sucks.

I also made it clear I’d hire people no matter how far they got as long as they communicated their plan and were able to solve problems. It’s not a real task, in real life you message your boss and say you need more time. I’m looking for “would I work with this person” and “what skills do they have, where can they improve, where would they fit on the team”.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

You could make good money teaching people how to do a proper interview.

[–] NewDawnOwl@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

That interview sounds interesting. I took a few hours to implement Conway's Game of Life on my microtonal grid project, but doing it over SQL seems challenging at first.

But then again, a table is basically a grid, so .... interesting.

If you're still hiring, I'd love to give it a try :D