this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
77 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

88390 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BauerBender@lemmy.world 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The technology to eradicate homelessness, hunger, war, climate change, and Cap’n Crunch cereal all exist too, but I don’t see anyone addressing those either.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

To even suggest someone commits violence against a wholesome cereal whose sole purpose is to rip up the mouths of young children is pure blasphemy.

Can someone report this guy!? It looks like we may have another Cereal Killer on the loose. /s

[–] BauerBender@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Oops All Genocide

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 59 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It shouldn’t have to take fifteen years to deploy effective products that can save lives

this is such a reductionist view.

it should absolutely take decades to make a sweeping decision to fundamentally alter an ecosystem. nobody likes disease or even getting a random bite. i grew up in the swamps of the US, i know. but we should absolutely know what we’re doing to release a genetically engineered or bacterial sterilizing agent into a naturally evolved ecosystem.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 37 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok. You can take decades if you have a systematic plan with data collection, time lines, expanded test beds, and reviews of emerging relevant science. But sitting on your hands for 15yrs isn't very productive.

People have been more than happy to do this with the food we eat under accelerated time lines (I'm not defending that, but it's not like there isn't precedent for genetic meddling at scale.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

they did mention doing harmonization studies, which is my biggest worry: cascading ecological effects.

the impetus can’t be “oh well they haven’t done the full studies so i guess we just full send and see what happens”.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

These techniques are targeted at individual species, not all mosquitoes, and the species in question are invasive species. If it was targeting native mosquitoes your comment would make more sense, but in this case the ecological effects should be neutral to positive.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Careful. Targeted bacteriological or viral methods can adapt once out in the open. What you ultimately cause may not be what was intended. What other creatures share traits that might be susceptible? Let's not pretend we've genomapped and understood everything out there.

Also mosquitos and their larvae are food for parts of the food web. If they are gone, what starves?

Unintended consequences are a real risk. Careful study should be required.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 21 hours ago

There's a large difference between 15 years of science to make sure something doesn't do more harm than it prevents, and taking a decade before someone even declares themselves as responsible for evaluating anything.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 7 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that reduce the dragon fly population as well (who eats mosquito larva)?

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Only like 3 species out of the something of 3500 mosquito species drink human blood/ carry diesease this way, and they only do this during the females pregnancy not as a primary food source.

And of those 3 species, I think one makes up the majority of mosquitos that are found worldwide and this is the one that would be targeted

https://askabiologist.asu.edu/mosquito-species

[–] shartgargle@lemmy.zip 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They eat other things as well. Supposedly mosquitoes are pretty much the only living thing that's completely useless, and can be eradicated with no ill effects.

[–] King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 3 points 11 hours ago

If I recall correctly mosquito larve are incredible water filters and are responsible for maintaining water quality in many types of wetlands.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 15 hours ago

They don't really control mosquito populations that much. Dragon flies prefer fresh permanent bodies of water (I think usually flowing too), whereas mosquito larvae inhabit stagnant pools.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A system to kill a fuck ton with lasers has existed for decades, but a patent troll is sitting on it.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Article says it kills slow moving flying insects... Worried this could also kill fireflies

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah I doubt any anti bug laser will stop to identify the type of bug.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

CMS to AAW AUTO!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

so yeah. genociding species tends not to end well. That being said we actually just need to eliminate the disease spreading mosquitos and don't need to get rid of them all so. maybe.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

These technologies are pretty much unable to completely genocide mosquitos unless deployed worldwide in an massive effort, which noone wants to actually do - they are really only problematic in areas where mosquitos and blood-borne diseases which get transmitted by them happen to coexist.

[–] cideyav138@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

no one

FTFY

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 2 points 15 hours ago

You don't need to be brave to use mosquito nets.

[–] reader@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 hours ago

dangerously overconfident

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago

A lot of technology to do a lot of cool shit already exists, we just refuse to use them

[–] PMP@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Mosquitoes are my mortal enemy, unless someone can prove their eradication will disrupt the food chain so much that great white sharks will disappear ... Push play already.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

elephant mosquitoes, the big mosquitoes you see arnt blood suckers, thier larva hunts the mosquitoe larvae that does suck blood