this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2026
936 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

88725 readers
2919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Who could have possibly seen this coming?!

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (31 children)

I think they may have located a more extreme, even dumber business category than "too big to fail": "too big to bail out".

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

Basically, the AI lab told backers to expect revenues approaching $50 billion — far shorter than the explosive $70 billion number reported previously.

Though that $70 billion figure was also based on leaked investor memos, OpenAI wasn’t in any hurry to deny it, digging itself into a $20 billion hole.

So they told investors they'd make $70b and now they're bringing down the forecast to $50b . $50b is still insane, that's more revenue then any other software company except Microsoft (and probably anthropic), next closest is Salesforce with $41b, and Salesforce built that revenue over decades. Open AI finished 2025 with $13b in revenue, that's nearly 4x growth in a year on more then 10 billion in revenue, that has never been done before.

Idk if this is a sign of a bubble collapsing just because it's record setting growth and revenue aren't as explosive as they initially said. It is still very much explosive, but more a fission bomb then an h bomb. It seems the market agrees, Nvidia is down ~1% on this news, but still up 5% on this month and 20% yoy.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Lectral@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sounds like it's almost bailout time again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah... I'm sure the bubble will pop any minute now.

Just like the Housing bubble.

And the Crypto bubble.

This article is conditioning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

Burst, baby, burst!

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Even if demand is there, as long as a user paying €200 / mo is costing the business €4,000 / mo then it’s not financially sustainable. (Along with the even worse ways it’s not sustainable)

Edit: see second comment below from partydisc explaining why the even the lower figure wasn’t well calculated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IamMoonPie@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let it pop! Let it pop! No bailouts for billionaires. Just let the fucking system collapse. I’ll happily go back to a trade a barter system of some kind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›