this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2026
292 points (92.7% liked)

Open Source

49469 readers
971 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brandon Thomas, developer of ArtCraft, a suite of open-source creative tools meant to replicate Adobe applications for free, has now announced apps to replace Microsoft Office tools such as Excel, PowerPoint, and Word, respectively, named GridCraft, DeckCraft, and WordCraft, that are created with Claude. Thomas has shared his new clones to ArtCraft GitHub, making them free for all to download.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] usdeurpes@lemmy.zip 1 points 27 minutes ago

Situation sucks because I would use Libreoffice if the UX wasn't some dogshit pooped out by a backend FOSS guy in his sleep

[–] HetareKing@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago

I don't think this is going to amount to anything; the rate he's popping these out suggest he's more motivated by making a point and/or prestige than getting something useful at the end, and turning these enormous codebases nobody has any intuition for into something maintainable is going to be grueling work that will make them wish they started from scratch. But if we imagine that this will go somewhere:

Wouldn't that be bad for open source in the long run?

Businesses, certainly not the larger ones, are not going to touch this for various reasons. So while Adobe and Microsoft may take a hit, it's not going to fundamentally harm their business models. Students, on the other hand, can't afford the real thing. If that leads to them to alternatives like LibreOffice, GIMP, or Krita, then when they end up in the workforce, there's going to be at least some pressure to let them use the tools they're used to. In fact, I use LibreOffice at work. But if they can have something that looks and feels exactly like Adobe's and Microsoft's products, they'll feel right at home with the real thing at work.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

might be slop, but it is a solution. i know not stomping on the little indie projects like gimp is the perfect way, i know governments should follow germany and ditch microsoft, but here we are. code probably can be untangeld, and implemented to other projects as well, so the ui might feel familiar, and compatible with every format.

we all know well that most of the time a designer has to send the pad file, and i know many controllers at finance that need their macros which wont work in other excels.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

As many free alternatives as there were before the rampant vibecoding, it seems that this growing collection of tools is not only functional, but a message to the large companies as well. Most of these apps are still far from what they intend to replace, however, so we'll have to see how deep this message cuts.

Blood in the water for Adobe. Acrobat is a steaming pile of garbage. My org worked with their engineering team to track down a bug that we reported. They affirmed the bug (app hangs on launch) and then took four to five months fixing it.

I've worked in software engineering. I know that debugging, patching, testing, verifying is difficult. But the enterprise license costs a lot and that was a very long time with a crippling bug. The only satisfactory answer (to me) is that they don't feel urgency because they are entrenched without real competition. They need to wake up.

(No, I don't think vibe-coded Acrobat replacements will unseat them. I think LLM-powered real devs will come for them because the moat is smaller.)

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

The only satisfactory answer (to me) is that they don't feel urgency because they are entrenched without real competition.

It's where the lines intersects with how much it would cost to fix it and how significantly the bug impacts their revenue.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah man but did you see the "Turn it into a podcast" button???? Great stuff!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, I see what you are going for but is "instructor" the proper term? To cut AI out of the picture, let's say the guy instead of paying for tokens paid a team of developers who did the work for him. What would you call the guy then? He does exactly the same amount and type of work in both cases, but obviously noone would call him "instructor".

[–] FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe 1 points 2 hours ago

That's called hiring a team of developers. I believe this would fall under the term producer depending on the situation? If he paid a team of developers and claimed he coded it himself then he'd be called a liar

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Where's the legal limit?

If I use AI to make and sell a Ford truck, will Ford sue and we can get precedent that AI use is still a copyright violation?

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Only 99% of the time.

It's possible to build models on only copyleft data, and include all relevant attribution

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 6 points 7 hours ago

Just brand it fjord

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You wouldn't download a car?

I have and I will

[–] ritsku@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

None of them work as intended and we already have free options why is this a headline

[–] likebudda@reddthat.com 4 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. If I needed something more powerful than google docs then I'd download LibreOffice.

[–] TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

True. I think it's greater value is being an AI middle finger to specific proprietary software. Especially if they incorporate and mainly focus on AI these days. As well as encourage it's use as a magical new tool.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Anything with AI in it gets clicks.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

most people do not even know that they exist to begin with.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 13 hours ago

"creator" my ass

[–] TheChargedCreeper864@lemmy.ml 13 points 15 hours ago

I think (from a layman's perspective) that these would have far more potential if they didn't fully commit to the "100% from scratch reimplementation in Rust, btw" bit. Especially for this Office suite, where a wealth of options already exist that they could build upon (LibreOffice, OnlyOffice/EuroOffice, Collabora Desktop) for more proven support of these formats.

That said, I hope they decide to vibe clone Clip Studio Paint someday, then there'd finally be an open-source tool that can open .clip files. And maybe that could even allow someone else to implement the format in Krita, GIMP and the like

[–] miadidi@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Why doesn’t the dev rather work on specific features sets on one existing project instead of building half baked fleet of slop.

[–] GeirGrusom@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yeah, ArtCraft is very poorly made. It's a bunch of AI tools jumbled together and is basic at best. It also buys into the entire Tech feudalism bullshit by being a cloud service.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

If this came to parity with any of the billion dollar apps it’s trying to replace we would have new laws banning it somehow within a month

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vagrantdumbo@lemmy.ml 14 points 16 hours ago

FOSS clones for software just to work on closed overengineered standards is stupid. We have had markdown for decades but still prefer oblong zip-xml files for writing rich text and slides!? Absurd.

Excel is the only MS Office product that makes sense to exist, and thus carries the brand to dominance largely by itself. Docs and slides have already been solved; I wish devs just focused on making the perfect Excel clone and abandon looking at all other MSOffice programs.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 22 points 19 hours ago

Massive nothing burger, those sloppy clones are fucking terrible in production, and dont believe me, look it up yourself.

Id love for it to be really of substantial value as it is now though.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Open source tools for all of these use cases have existed for over a decade and people still buy both adobe and Microsoft office. I don't think some slop apps are going to change that.

I'm a Microsoft hater but I don't think this will changes the wider publics opinion on them?

Open office and libreoffice have been around a good while now.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›