this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2026
45 points (95.9% liked)

Privacy

51394 readers
558 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jld@lemmy.zip 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I spent months speaking up against this, and I learned something sad: nobody cares. So now the way I think about it is that apathy leads to its own punishment. It’s depressing.

[–] custom_username@reddthat.com 5 points 4 hours ago

I feel like the average person is too obsessed with convenience and/or not smart enough to draw certain technologies to their logical conclusions. At least you'll be able to say "yeah I warned you about that 10 years ago".

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect that the 'apathy' thing might be more complex than appears on the surface. For example, there might be a certain amount of mental self-protection going on there, even though that probably sounds paradoxical in terms of taking vital action against a future surveillance state.

[–] jld@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I understand, but now I am the one protecting my mental health. I won't be a proxy anymore. Instead I'll take out my popcorn and watch the collapse.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah kind of me too. Sick of warning everyone who won't listen.

[–] cpbsy@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

From the article:

Key findings

  • In both democratic and authoritarian contexts, technologies are being deployed in ways that erode, and in some cases effectively dismantle, human rights.
  • Technology use risks facilitating or amplifying repressive practices and systems, and becoming an instrument of authoritarian governance.
  • Surveillance technologies are being expanded and entrenched with the purpose of exerting control over entire populations and/or specific groups of people such as journalists and human rights defenders.
  • The authoritarian use of technology is ultimately having a ‘chilling effect’.
  • Some technologies are disproportionately intrusive by design and should not be used.
  • Technologies’ use is often incompatible with the rule of law, lack redress and raise mass impunity risks.
  • A lack of transparency facilitates the authoritarian use of technologies.
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

both democratic and authoritarian contexts

ha, how do we tell them?