this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
224 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

68083 readers
1041 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myyass@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago

Last time I was in Thailand and my buddy told me don't worry, she's not a trap.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 7 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

so whats a passkey and how is it different from a password?

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 14 hours ago

That passkeys are a trap article also has straight up one of the best explanations what passkeys are https://nonfunctional.substack.com/p/passkeys-are-a-trap-do-not-use-them

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

A passkey is cryptographically signed by the server when it's created.

So it does not only has your credentials encrypted which are then used to login to a server, but it also carries information about the server and only that server can request the credentials from the passkey. So unlike a password a passkey is resistent to phishing attempts as you can't actually give your credentials away to anyone but the actual server it was created for.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 8 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Or "Like all questions of security vs convenience, a user should decide what they are or are not comfortable with."

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago

Passkeys are a good idea to prevent phishing. Using passkeys but then require a second method to login as a backup to prevent lockout when you lose your key (as many sites do) is epic bullshit. It makes an actual security improvement into some convenience feature so people don't need to remember/type passwords anymore. Because the phishing will now ask for the alternative/recovery login to fix some alleged problem with your account/passkey...

So it suddenly does not provide additional security anymore above what a password manager would already do.

When you sell somehting as a security feature then instantly defeat the additional security to make it just about convenience the question about the actual goal feels natural...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MaxLemminist@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

Again with this?
I'm going to do the smart thing, get drunk and pass that key to a designated driver and let him figure it out.

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

No duality: only suck

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Seems like if you want something to be able to be unlocked, you'll need a key.

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

It's the typical case of perfect being the enemy of good.

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago

Passkeys.. how to make the public still not understand mutual TLS...

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world -5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you read the pro article you can tell its a bunch of hogwash as they don't understand Tue point of passkeys.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 7 points 15 hours ago

The person that wrote the anti article thinks that 2fa is a form of password… they’re the one that doesn’t understand passkeys.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›