this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
1036 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
3147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wrassleman76@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I don't think it's even possible to get rid of VPNs without outright banning encryption. If I set up a VPN that uses an obscure port and the traffic is encrypted, how are they going to know it's even a VPN?

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Attached below is a Wireshark trace I obtained by sniffing my own network traffic.

I want to draw your attention to this part in particular:

Underneath "User Datagram Protocol", you can see the words "OpenVPN Protocol". So anyone who sniffs my traffic on the wire can see exactly the same thing that I can. While they can't read the contents of the payload, they can tell that it's OpenVPN traffic because the headers are not encrypted. So if a router wanted to block OpenVPN traffic, all they would have to do is drop this packet. It's a similar story for Wireguard packets. An attacker can read the unencrypted headers and learn

  • The size of the transmission
  • The source and destination IP addresses by reading the IP header
  • The source and destination ports numbers by reading the TCP or UDP headers
  • The underlying layers, up until the point it hits an encrypted protocol (such as OpenVPN, TLS, or SSH)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 37 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Not even China can ban VPN entirely, because businesses use it as a security measure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The UK is the testing grounds. After they figure it out, they’ll be rolling it out everywhere else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thenose@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Show me a ban that didn’t came with 10x problems. People have their needs even the filthy ones. Especially the filthy ones. Hence will find a way to fulfill it. If there’s no legal way to do so the demand will create an alternative market for it to match the demand…more trouble on the way if that’s the lane the UK choose

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We all know that prohibition in the US was a rousing success!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There are ways around this even if they do ban vpn. Its a hopeless battle being fought by the ignorant.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago (15 children)

I mean anyone can rent a server in Europe and install OpenVPN themselves. Hell, it doesn't even need to open OpenVPN, Wireguard works just as well and is basically undetectable.

Eat shit, UK government, for real. Idiots think that by speaking the same language as US fascists they can have similarly dumb ideas.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Download Tor, Whonix & Tails

[–] MU5T4N6@feddit.org 18 points 4 days ago

Labour was supposed to destroy the Tories, not join them!

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Next up, zeros and/or ones

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Just adopt a CCP style social credit system already. Why all of this pussyfooting around being a totalitarian, censorship focused, surveillance state? Just do it. Give the good people of UK a solid reason to be a little bit more French again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Can't wait for the next election to kick out the Tories so can roll back all their draconian bills.

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 25 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Couldn't people just hire a VPS in another country and VPN with that using Wireguard etc, or even use RDP etc to it? Is it even a VPN if you're remotely operating a computer in another country?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Bye bye UK economy. How do you expect businesses to work without VPNs?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›