this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
836 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74247 readers
5076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 148 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a nice CloudFlare ad

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (10 children)

yeah. still not worth dealing with fucking cloudflare. fuck cloudflare.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm out of the loop, what's wrong with cloud flare?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 101 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Perplexity argues that a platform’s inability to differentiate between helpful AI assistants and harmful bots causes misclassification of legitimate web traffic.

So, I assume Perplexity uses appropriate identifiable user-agent headers, to allow hosters to decide whether to serve them one way or another?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

yeah it's almost like there as already a system for this in place

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tibi@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

You could say they are... Perplexed.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here comes the ridiculous offer to buy Google chrome with money they don't have: easy delicious scraping directly from the user source

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 249 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When a firm outright admits to bypassing or trying to bypass measures taken to keep them out, you think that would be a slam dunk case of unauthorized access under the CFAA with felony enhancements.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fuck that. I don't need prosecutors and the courts to rule that accessing publicly available information in a way that the website owner doesn't want is literally a crime. That logic would extend to ad blockers and editing HTML/js in an "inspect element" tag.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (25 children)

That logic would not extend to ad blockers, as the point of concern is gaining unauthorized access to a computer system or asset. Blocking ads would not be considered gaining unauthorized access to anything. In fact it would be the opposite of that.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They already prosecute people under the unauthorized access provision. They just don’t prosecute rich people under it.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

They prosecuted and convicted a guy under the CFAA for figuring out the URL schema for an AT&T website designed to be accessed by the iPad when it first launched, and then just visiting that site by trying every URL in a script. And then his lawyer (the foremost expert on the CFAA) got his conviction overturned:

https://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-auernheimer

We have to maintain that fight, to make sure that the legal system doesn't criminalize normal computer tinkering, like using scripts or even browser settings in ways that site owners don't approve of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 237 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's difficult to be a shittier company than OpenAI, but Perplexity seems to be trying hard.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Step 1, SOMEHOW find a more punchable face than Altman

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Altman’s face looks like it’s already been punched

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

put META android zuckerberg on or mechahitler musk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s the entire point, dipshit. I wish we got one of the cool techno dystopias rather than this boring corporate idiot one.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

I'm still holding out for Stephen Hawking to mail out Demon Summoning programs.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 1 day ago

Traveling snake oil salesman complains he can't pick people's locks.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

They do have a point though. It would be great to let per-prompt searches go through, but not mass scrapping

I believe a lot of websites don't want both though

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 day ago

As far as security is concerned, their w's are pretty common tbh. It's just the whole centralization issue.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good. I went through my CF panel, and blocked some of those "AI Assistants" that by default were open, including Perplexity's.

load more comments (2 replies)

Well... Good.

good, that means it’s working

I’m gonna be frustrated (though not surprised) if the response is anything other than this.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It seems like it's some kind of distraction to make people think things aren't as bad as they really are, it just sounds too far-fetched to me.

It's like a bear that has eaten too much and starts whining because a small rabbit is running away from him, even though the bear has already eaten almost all the rabbits and is clearly full.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You'd think that a competent technology company, with their own AI would be able to figure out a way to spoof Cloudflare's checks. I'd still think that.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Or find a more efficient way to manage data, since their current approach is basically DDOSing the internet for training data and also for responding to user interactions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wosat@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

This is why companies like Perplexity and OpenAI are creating browsers.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›