this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

4096 readers
457 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago

No surprise. The US issued any real action in antitrust cases in many decades. I think the AT&T split is really the only major one I can even remember having any real impact on improving competition. Since then lobbying and campaign contributions have skyrocketed and corporations own most of the government anyway, so there's almost no chance of a court being able to issue a real punishment.

[–] f1error@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Google gets to remain evil.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Does this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

They ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 2 points 6 days ago

That's a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.