this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
547 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74890 readers
2700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'd buy a 8k TV, provided that it has no smarts, no WiFi, no TV tuner and its price isn't over 5% than a 4k TV

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Here I am still downloading the 720p versions of movies and not minding at all. If I want hyper resolution imagery I just go outside.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would be fine with an 8k TV if there was 8k content and they were affordable. I haven’t purchased a TV in over a decade however and my TVs all work fine so I’m not even in the market

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I work off metered data. I’m happy with 360p.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resplendent606@piefed.social 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm happy with 1080p content. I have a 4k TV and from the couch I can't see a difference. I would be perfectly happy with a bargain 4k TV, bigger the better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well the good thing is info storage cost and processing power tends to increase over time, so that’s one side of their argument handled; and things tend to keep progressing technologically over time, so I’d assume 8k would eventually replace 4k, and so on and so on; but the human eye does have a limit to what it can resolve- so at some point 2d images will probably just be as good as we need them to be

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Maybe if they add 3D, people will buy them!

/s

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago (7 children)

8K content is too storage hungry. My pirate ship is already bursting at the seams with some 4K but mostly 1080. I have 130TB of media, if it was in 8K I would need a water cooled server farm.

That's the REAL reason for lack of 8K interest, the pirates are not demanding it. Not until 100TB drives are available for a reasonable price.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I got a 4k monitor, and I could barely tell the difference with 1080p

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›