Technology

You can already patch windows as much as you want.

I didnt my finance and IT team did.

If you ever want to create a google fan, make them use M365

Would all the Linux versions out there be subjected the same 15 years of updates??

They shouldn't be, since the model for updates is quite distinct from Windows or iOS in a way that I would argue should effectively meet the requirements anyways. If a distro releases a new version twice a year, outside of enterprise situations where a company is paying for support, there's nothing to really stop anyone who wants from upgrading. They don't charge for it, and while new versions might add out-of-the-box support for new hardware, it's pretty rare for Linux to suddenly change minimum hardware requirements in a way that requires you to buy a whole new machine in order to run the latest release. The only case that immediately comes to mind is that of distros increasingly removing support for i386 machines, but in fairness, Intel discontinued manufacturing of i386 chips 18 years ago.

Of course, this all assumes that the people in charge of making these decisions actually understand the technology in at least a general sense, and it's not being left up to a bunch of idiots who have refused to keep up with any innovations more recent than the fax machine, so odds are kind of crap.

No, Windows 11 added extra, unneeded hardware requirements.

Obsolete in this case actually means obsolete. Windows 11 literally blocks the update because you do not meet requirements, such as not having a TPM.

Technically, there are ways to bypass this, but not for a casual user (and it probably breaks some ToS)

You don't typically pay to run Linux distros. They're open-source. I can't imagine they'd be subject to this.

Correct, the "obsolete" PCs can't update to Windows 11. The Windows 11 update forces certain hardware support that a lot of devices don't have. The security this hardware provides is mainly in someone physically removing data from your PC. As such it's very business oriented but affects all versions of Windows 11.

I agree with most of that, but there are loads of embedded systems still running the equivalent of Windows XP and they're chugging along just fine. That OS still receives updates and ending that would break a lot of backend stuff. Mostly banking.

Boeing just started making planes which don't rely on floppy disks for updates. That will continue on the older part of the fleet until it's no longer feasible to procure the disks or the planes are no longer airworthy. I mean, why not? If you only need to store a few mbs for something critical, it's not a bad choice of medium.

If a system is secure, reliable and works for decades without complaint, there's no need to fix that.

15 years is too long, it doesn’t match the state of the industry or technological progress.

How is this too long? I would consider it a reasonable amount of time to receive security updates on a computer.

I have a notebook that I bought in 2012. It can run Ubuntu LTS 24.04, which is supported until 2034, without issue. There is no indication that the next release will stop supporting this hardware. I don't see why Microsoft couldn't provide this.

15 years is actually reasonable.

I have a ten year old laptop with an i7 processor, 16 GB RAM, and 1 TB SSD. It still does most things, I bought it for initially just fine. Granted this was one of the best laptops you could buy at the time.

Apple stopped supporting it with a current version of macOS a couple of years ago sadly. It’s still possible to patch newer versions to install and run on the old machine, but it’s a bit of a hassle.