this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4286 readers
497 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A sci-fi idea is gaining supporters, from billionaires to city councils. Whether it’s feasible is another matter.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250920120913/https://www.wired.com/story/data-centers-gobble-earths-resources-what-if-we-took-them-to-space-instead/

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Gods, why? Vacuum is the ultimate thermal insulator, so getting rid of waste heat is troublesome, launching large amounts of hardware into orbit isn't exactly cheap, electronics will need additional EM / particle shielding and maintenance when something inevitably breaks or wears out might be a bit harder than usual.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

shhhhhhshshsh sh sh. Let them. Let them take their stupid fucking infrastructure disasters up into stupid space. this seems like a profitable outcome for everyone 👀 there are lots of reasons to do it

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, I'm all for rich leeches having less money, but I'd prefer it if we didn't let them piss precious resources away on stupid shit when there's real problems to be solved. How about just seizing some of their obscene wealth and build some solar farms, fund fusion research or build cheap housing for the homeless or something?

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's ideal. I guess I'm losing the faith sometimes that's even on the table

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Which is unfortunately completely understandable. Sometimes I think Americans (and a few other notable polities) forget who owns their damn country. Despite what the bits stored on the SSD's of their Swiss banks might otherwise indicate, it's not the small handful of billionaires. It's not the politicians either. It's the people actually paying their taxes rather than dodging them.

I firmly believe that when a significant proportion of 340 million individuals collectively decide something has to be done, then that thing will get done, one way or the other. Regrettably, the members of the American Aristocracy are really good at dividing and conquering the hoi polloi.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is dumb, space is extremely expensive to get to, power is fairly limited, cooling is a nightmare, and micro meteorite impacts can not only dammage the data center, but possibly initiate Kessler syndrome.

Now a few years ago I read an old article about Microsoft experimenting with submerged data centers which is a way better idea, it is relatively cheap to get to, power is easy to deal with, cooling is trivial, and you don't need to worry about micro meteorites or Kessler syndrome.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

You also need to factor in radiation, connectivity and serviceability

Good luck keeping your data intact and actually usable.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

I don't really see why you would want this

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sam Altman

Of-fucking-course.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago

How the fuck do these dim bulbs ever get this rich in the first place?

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

big tech proving yet again that it's full of people who are breathtakingly stupid outside their narrow area of expertise

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Replace big tech with local inventor and nothing changes