this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
92 points (83.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34979 readers
18 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, what Israel is doing today is no different from what the Nazis did before and at the beginning of World War II, extreme nationalism, illegal expansion, annexation of foreign territory claiming it historically belongs to them, propaganda using the latest technology, terrorizing neighbors, military at the center of society.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

Being a Nazi is not only not banned in most countries, in some like the US it's explicitly legal (i.e. "Freedom of Speech"). That said, it is (kinda) banned in Germany, yet they are still around over here, because you can't ban people from believing in stuff.

All a state can do is to try and prevent them from gaining too much traction, and I do not feel like Zionism has all that much tbh. Israel's recent actions are very unpopulat in the west, even though most people are not even affected by them in the slightest. Many of the people who protest them probably have no direct connection to Israel or Gaza. So what's the goal of a ban even?

I can only speak for Germany, but here an Israeli sniper and alledged murderer fled the country, bacause he is being persecuted for warcrimes, i.e. the murder of civilians. You also cannot call for the extermination of anyone without riscing consequences. This does not prevent people from being Nazis, Zionists or anything else. It just sanctions them for publicly expressing it.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Because being involved in international politics at the state level has a similarly effect on one's morals as the One Ring

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago

Looking at America, obviously Nazism isn't banned, we have elected a ton of the fuckers.

[–] collar@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Nazism isn’t “banned” per se, at least in the U.S. as the First Amendment does not allow for viewpoint discrimination, however repugnant a viewpoint might be. But the First Amendment does not protect against cultural, social, or other forms of non-government backlash for those who support disgusting ideologies like Nazism.

So there is no “banning” that could take place of the Zionist viewpoint, if we were to consider it on par with Nazism. By and large in the U.S., Zionism and Nazism are not seen as equally repugnant viewpoints in the cultural landscape, hence the difference in how supporters of these views are treated. Hope that makes sense.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

because Nazis was the enemy and declared war on them while Zionists are the west allies.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well, at least in the US, Israel “donates” money via groups like AIPAC to politicians and scores them lucrative business deals in return for political favors and financial aid to Israel, using taxpayer money.

Which they turn around and give a part of it back to the politicians in their next bribe. It’s massively profitable for both Israel and the US politicians, as well as the military contractors who make the weapons the US “sells” to Israel.

In short, Israel helps US politicians embezzle taxpayer money legally for their personal gain.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

This genocide really brought home how brainwashed I was by the likes of AIPAC.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 6 points 6 days ago

Because those same countries were never ideologically opposed to fascism in the first place. America was a major inspiration for Hitler, namely in its jim crow laws and eugenics. Before world war 2, America loved Hitler. And the western powers are the reason why Zionism exists as an influential ideology to begin with. Britain gave the land for zionists to colonize to begin with. All of these same countries also committed the same atrocities themselves when colonizing places like the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Liberal governments have never been opposed to colonialism, genocide, or fascism.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

Capitalist countries rarely enforce their policies on right wing extremism. Fascism is a guard dog of capital they think they can keep leashed. In the 20th century that guard dog was pointed east so that it could harm the communists which threatened capital then. Today that guard dog is used to control resources in west asia and hide the dirtier work of imperialism that the west doesn't want as seen on their hands. They can't ban zionism because they need Israel and zionism is foundational to Israel.

[–] Swordinferno@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Well, at least here in the US it's because our politicians are openly bribed by Israel.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People are still pretty sorry about the Holocaust, there's Christian mysticism associated with it, the Middle East is a rough neighborhood and Zionists have all of those things to great effect.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just like most "rough neighborhoods" in the States, it is kept that way by the CIA and capital owners (ie, the empire) to uphold the threats of capitalism

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

What about the space aliens? /s

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting this is some fringe conspiracy? Lol. Lmao.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The part where the US contributed to the region sucking is real, although it goes back past the American century as well. The rest sounds (ahem) very Lemmy.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The rest? The part about US cities? Never heard of the crack epidemic, or the MOVE bombings in philli, or the Tulsa massacre, or COINTELPRO? The list goes on.

I get that head-in-sand is easier but this is declassified, [relatively] well known stuff and this isnt even starting with the 21st century

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 6 days ago

Because... gestures at wikipedia. It's a long story.

[–] dataprolet@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Because Zionism is not per se a problematic thing let alone comparable to Nazism. It's basically the idea that Jews should have their own nation in any form or shape. It's a national liberation movement.

What Netanjahu and his racket is making out of it is Religious or Revisionist Zionism specifically. And it's at least slightly problematic comparing that to Nazism as well.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago

t’s basically the idea that Jews should have their own nation in any form or shape.

Honestly I don't see how ethnonationalism is a positive idea no matter what the ethnicity is

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, there's also the whole issue of the planned site for the state being occupied, and not even wanting to share with the original inhabitants.

Less problematic than Nazism, though? Sure.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, before starting with Zyclon-B, also the Nazis wanted the Jews to just move to Madagascar.

So I really just see a temporal offset.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's not uncommon for ethnic conflicts in general, but there's a lot of extra dimensions in the Nazi case. The Jewish conspiracy that handed WWI to the Entante and was also behind communism somehow was always a centerpiece of their whole ideology.

And obviously, Nazis didn't just go after Jews. They make up about half of the Holocaust and are dwarfed by random war casualties, often civilian. If they won the plan was to kill a good share of all Slavs and bring back slavery for the rest. There's nobody more recent I'd say are on the same tier except maybe ISIS.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

However, the problem is that these extremist influences are not a new occurrence in Zionism but have been a part of it since the beginning of the political movement. The question of how to deal with the fact there was basically no habitable place on earth left uninhabited to found a state in, was answered very differently by different parts of the movement.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"Western democratic" countries love their manifest destinies and their Lebensraums. The reason they, after a lot of infighting, mostly agreed the Nazis were bad is that they also did it to white people. Zionists are just continuing that proud tradition, now on a target they agree is subhuman, so it's illegal to be against it.

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Mostly because a lot of western nations got occupied/ bombed by the Nazis, but not by zionists

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Sadly, Nazism isn't banned in most western countries.

They couldn't even get that right.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago

Law is a social construct

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The people deciding what gets banned are zionists.

[–] dataprolet@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That sound an aweful lot like a conspiracy.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not really. They're pretty open about it. A lot of them campaign on it.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 6 days ago

Nazism isn't banned anywhere. If it were, Zionism and any other nationalism would most certainly be banned.

To answer your question, because it serves capital.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Basically, because NATO and Russia are in an economic stand-off where Iran is the key, and Israel is really the only plausible excuse for the US to invade Iran

NATO and China.
Russia is a pawn in the game now.

[–] Tuuktuuk@piefed.ee -2 points 6 days ago

They have the same intent, but there's no proof that there is a plan to really actively murder all Palestinians. Also, people in Gaza now have about as much food to eat as inmates of Nazi concentration camps had in the first half of 1940's, but the rest of the horrible torture is not being done.

So, basically, people are okay with what the Nazis did between 1932 and 1941. But from 1941 onwards, Nazis went over some line that is not acceptable.

In my opinion, Nazis were horribly evil already in 1932 and what they did back then was already absolutely condemnable, but it seems that most people in our society don't share my view on this. You are allowed to commit a genocide using starvation and bullets, like the Nazis did until 1941, but when you start using actual gas chambers, it becomes a no-no.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

All the western countries done their own genocides within recent history, and have run out of victims. But the basic colonial mindset never went away.

It must be like a breath of fresh air that, yet again, brave Europeans have a frontier to conquer and savages to tame.

That, and most leaders are being actively blackmailed by the Israeli intelligence services; and also, a good chunk of their population thinks Israel is required for their Sky God to kill most of the people on earth and reap their souls in judgment day.

Western democracies have done a lot of progress the last generations, but scratch at the surface and one will find a medieval mindset. Scratch at that and one finds a stone age mindset.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

frontier to conquer and savages to tame.

I hear that but I don't see any fucking taming being done - zero countries except Palestine are active, Ukraine is occupied with their own oppression, so zero leaderships are deserving of my recognition or respect. Every single leader is either a weak-chinned worm refusing to object to evil, a savage and cruel monster oppressing the weaker or a nothing who abstains from conflict, and all need to be burned out and replaced by people who can lead.

We need fucking liberation armies

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

all need to be burned out and replaced by people who can lead

I suspect effective and able leaders are being selected against, in many parts of the planet, due to recent changes of economies and technology.

But even in the older days they were very rare. Societies enable sociopaths regardless of government philosophy. They always have.

I think the Palestinians are victims of an alignment of malice, indifference and arseholes. They cannot be rescued unless evacuated. And the West Bank will follow Gaza later.

Anyone who is not a spineless worm is checked by the American military parked nearby. And contrary to the hopes of many, America will be there for all the steps, and will not just go away due to issues

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

IMO it's because the western oligarchs are making bank selling military tech to israel.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And getting land and other natural resources, likely.

[–] viking@infosec.pub -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What land? The booby trapped gravel pit that used to be Gaza? Nobody wants that.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago

Why would you say something so devoid of public knowledge or forethought? Settlers want it, because they claim it. Trump is talking about Trump Resort there.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 6 days ago

Also, climate change isn't going to be too kind to the area

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

Since other Westerners are paying, it's not actually a net gain.

[–] antifa_ceo@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is it. Israel is too profitable for them to detox from. They get to test out sick new tech to spy on and abuse their citizens, they get to put pressure on nations in the surrounding area with resources they want, and just the sheer amount of money selling weapons in general.

It's one of the most lucrative grifting exercises the western nations have ever designed.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how much the "ignore your genocide" fee is.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 6 days ago

Pretty big, when you consider AIPAC* and propaganda. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65051

load more comments
view more: next ›