This seems like bullshit to me. The UK sector I work in, 68,000 jobs were lost due to back in 2023. They all quoted the same rubbish as "simplifying operations using AI".
My company has admitted this year they got it wrong and have backtracked.
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
This seems like bullshit to me. The UK sector I work in, 68,000 jobs were lost due to back in 2023. They all quoted the same rubbish as "simplifying operations using AI".
My company has admitted this year they got it wrong and have backtracked.
Any excuse to fire the poor performers without perceptions of a normal layoff
In addition to the results pointed out by studies like those posted by @ekZepp@lemmy.world I feel it’s not a simple question of ‘which jobs can now be done by AI/LLMs’.
The ramifications of the wider ecosystem are more complex. For example, as this article illustrates, the actual search for a job is just horrible under this new paradigm. With the combination of copious machine generated job offers, machine generated job applications and machine driven applicant screenings, everything melts down into lowest common denominator stat-hiring process sludge, especially in combination with the more ‘platform’ driven hiring patterns of many sectors.
What about the people doing those jobs tho?
I work in software, every week I try to get copilot to entirely complete a simple work item as a benchmark of where the technology is up to.
For the last month or two, I have had two models in copilot regularly successfully identify the problem, write unit tests and then fix production code. Only minor manual changes have been necessary.
It's getting to the point where the LLM is solving the problem and completing the work item in less time than most non-senior developers. No one is being fired as a direct result, but instead people are starting to work faster.
The first six months was definitely a productivity loss though.