this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
481 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76299 readers
2978 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If 4chan continues to ignore Ofcom, the forum could be blocked in the UK. And 4chan could face even bigger fines totaling about $23 million or 10 percent of 4chan’s worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. 4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 189 points 1 week ago (52 children)

The UK should just block sites that don't comply. They have no business trying to fine US websites.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 week ago

People should fight for their rights and free speech and make pressure on the gouvernement. Blocking is isolationism.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It's a process. They need to issue the fine first to give them a chance to pay rather than jumping to blocking it. If they continue to refuse to pay that's where it'll go.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Extort, you mean. The law threatens them with abduction and being held in captivity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 162 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Imagine running a website for 20 years, changing absolutely nothing, and one day you're being targeted because someone else on the other side of the planet changed something at their end.

Tell them to piss off.

They'll come after your phpbb instance next.

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

“Block us then. We’re not paying your fines and you’ll never arrest us as we’ll never step foot in your country. Get fucked.” That’s about the response I’d have I think… attached with a photo of tubgirl or something for the classic lawls.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 124 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

This is a case of stupid laws that still don't understand the internet (35+ years in to wide use, mofos)

If an http GET request initiated from country A traverses routers and wires around the globe to grab some data from a server in country B, then we have to accept that the owners of the server are not "operating in country A" and in fact the user in country A is responsible for import.

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

All that is tongue in cheek to say they can fuck right off.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Yeah it's a stupid law and they were told it wouldn't work by industry experts. But the politicians that were in power when all this was first been decided were Conservatives and therefore arrogant and of the opinion that if they don't like something, it's realities responsibility to reconfigure itself.

Then Labour got in and for some reason implemented the stupid law anyway despite having heard none of the consultations, and of course now it turns out that the consultations told them not to do it. Now I'm sure the industry experts would have been ignored anyway but Labour look really daft now.

They have basically accepted that this law is unworkable and is basically going to be ignored by everyone, but they still have to go through all of the pantomime of trying to enforce it. I'm sure eventually they'll quietly kill it because the whole thing has been such an embarrassment for them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

What used to be called The Great Firewall of China. It used to be unthinkable for western countries.

You can't blame this on old people. This is only happening now that the Boomers are on the way out. People who sent international letters or made international phone calls were aware that they were communicating with a different country with different laws. I think we are seeing this now, because now we have people who experience the internet as something happening on their own phone, at their location.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The boomers are not on their way out. We have the exact same politicians in power that we had 30 fucking years ago.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 114 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

British government fines an American company, based in America, for serving data from American servers that was compliant with American law.

This whole law is complete overreach. It's like banning a book and then getting mad at the author when one of your citizens buys one on holiday and brings it back with them

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think Iran should fine the UK just as much for allowing the Satanic verses to be sold since that novel are banned in Iran.

Any argument they give is the same argument why the 4chan shit is laughable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Salman Rushdie: First time?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 112 points 1 week ago (18 children)

If you're ok with this then imagine your local lemmy instance getting fined by China/Qatar/Thailand/etc for posting something breaking their laws.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fine the phone company for allowing calls they don't like.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 90 points 1 week ago (2 children)

4chan also faces potential arrest and/or “imprisonment for a term of up to two years,” the lawsuit said.

You don't want to be locked in a small cell with 4chan for two years.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

"I'm not stuck here with you. You're stuck here with me!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll never control the hacker known as 4chan

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I think 4chan is a pretty cool guy. Eh gets fined by the UK and doesn't afraid of anything.

[–] nuxi@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

4chan's actual legal response to this can be summarized as "We are incorporated in Delaware which has not been subject to UK law since 1783. See the Treaty of Paris".

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

I wanna see how a website would be sent to jail.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Clearly they're after the notorious hacker known as 4chan

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

I see you never downloaded a car before.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gemini24601@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is it even possible for Ofcom to legally fine 4chan for these issues? How does a company in the UK fine a US company?

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It works the same way they can fine domestic businesses: Pay up or we'll stop you from doing any more business in this country.

In the context of a website like 4chan that means pay the fine or get blocked by every UK based ISP.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 1 week ago

I don't think that would deter any of their user base.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This censorship shit is out of control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

4chan is likely using this to take it to the courts.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

hope they write their legal battle in green txt

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

be me

American't social mediatard

Britbongs demand money

Notmyproblem.png

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

The global push for censorship is accelerating and not nearly enough people are woke to it.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Will the notorious hacker known as 4chan finally get his comeuppance?

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So then.... Potential arrest and imprisonment for 4chan for no proven damage. Meanwhile, Trump can visit the King.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And they think 4chan ever complied with anything. How adorable!

[–] vodka@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

They do though, 4chan complies with US laws and regulations. They regularly hand over logs to various US agencies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Offcom has been drinking, came home in a blackout and committed domestic abuse of 4chan. Does Offcom even internet? Alternative plot twist, Offcom is trolling 4chan.

I wanna say that Offcom is doing a good job and trying to protect British people in good faith but I feel like they are being used as a cudgel by the British ruling class to advance an anachronistic agenda. Don't forget, they fired their expert drugs advisor for telling them that MDMA is comparable to horse riding in terms of safety. They want certain things to be true, regardless of the scientific accuracy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

They have no way of making them pay.

load more comments
view more: next ›