this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
270 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

76299 readers
2716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Humanity could do many great things in this world with AI. Instead we are coming up with innovative new ways to give you ads. Get me out of this timeline.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] oh_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Now I have to go re watch old Futurama. Perfection.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 week ago

That's creepy as fuck and would guarantee I never buy that product.

[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Death to AI, death to capitalism

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Death to allegra geller! Death to existenz!

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Long live the new flesh

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago

Maan, I‘d rather have proper self lacing shoes. This version of the future sucks.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't wait for this shit to become so pervasive that I only read paper books.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Paper books and comparable are now prohibited under the konzom act, your daily advertisement quota has been increased until morale improves or your mind breaks, whichever comes first.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

Nope, nope and nope.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

These remaining DirecTV subscribers are gonna be pissed when AT&T swaps out the dial-tone on their landline for an ad stream.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most of them are probably boomers and will be dead soon, anyway

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it means they will finally stop fucking voting then good deal all around!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have zoomers for the nazi vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 22 points 1 week ago

Hahaha, that's not dystopian at all, hahahaha.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not my face. I‘m staying far away from those things. I wonder if generating personalized ads can even be profitable. Seems like a lot of effort to dish out some slop.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

It probably depends on how personalized the ads are. It should come as no surprise that targeted ads have been a thing as long as ads have existed. Coke ads during family shows, alcohol ads (you'll be cool if you use our product) on MTV, etc.

There are already a number of algorithms to deliver one ad for a product over another, based on likely demographics. Streaming has greatly increased this, since specific demographic details are immediately and directly available when the ad is shown. I won't get the same as on Hulu that you get.

As for generating ads on-the-fly, that seems unlikely. Few ads are fully generated at all, let alone in response to demographics or the specific viewer(s).

There are also risks when deploying ads without vetting. Some of these viewers will be dressed as Nazis, and will happily share the video to everyone.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah yes, that’s what will get me to engage with ads all they needed to do was put my face in them.

Business majors are so fucking stupid.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It will engage me to turn it off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

Ads are much more likely to be effective on me if they have attractive people in them.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I was taught none of that during my undergrad. Instead, i say that people who are greedy just happened to get business degrees as a tool to help them be greedy.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

How the fuck are they getting your face?

[–] dublet@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

DirecTV's screensavers will let a user create an AI avatar of themself by scanning a QR code on the screensaver

You are expected to volunteer your face. And interact with the ads. Because you are getting this device to watch ads. Apparently.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Bojack Horseman would look great as my face then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Haha you probably think those things in your yard are birds

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Makes sence that the birds aren't working at the moment since the government is shutdown

[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well the US gov birds aren’t working

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Who in their right mind would think this is a good idea? Are managers so caught up in the "just add AI bro it will make us cool" hype train that no one stops to think "yeah I would never want this in my living room"?

[–] cheesorist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

they know what they're doing, they're just disgusting humanoids.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How long before someone uses this feature to create a feature length porno?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is going to be an absolute nightmare for schizophrenics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

I hate what humanity chose to do with its "God given" gifts.

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Literal nightmare fuel

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

OK so that's the set we shouldn't buy. OK noted.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You misspelled "shove"

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ok grandpa, turn off the DirectTV and power down your AM radio. Using a technology that old is guaranteed to land you deep in enshittification-land.

I've been watching Jellyfin for a while and I have not seen the first ad,

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I have generated videos with me in them and it's a very weird feeling. Actually getting surprised by them in an ad would be brutally unpleasant. They will never do this.

That being said, they will absolutely put people that reassemble us. So personalized ad with someone that has the same hair color, skin color, height, facial structure and age, wearing about the same kind of clothes we usually do.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

reassemble

I'm sure that was autocorrect, but it feels awfully portentous.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably run some GSA algorithm to make a version of you that could be a long-lost half-sibling you inexplicably want to fuck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

I surprised you think they will "never do this". They will have some study done by an entity closely connected to an AI firm that affirms that "this makes products X amount more likely to sell!"

Whether it is true or not will be irrelevant. They will do it.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

TIL DirecTV is still around.

[–] DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its like that one Black Ops 2 mission

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Salazar: We're all going to hell, man.

[–] DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m so glad someone on this platform got that reference

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

I replayed BO2 earlier this year because it takes place in 2025. I was shocked at how close its world is to ours.

If you had told me in like 2013 that, between the Black Ops series and the Modern Warfare series, Black Ops would have the more realistic plot points, I would have called you crazy.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Seems like a real can / should problem to me.

Hard to believe this would entice anyone to purchase where a sexy lady couldn't.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

looking pretty gay in that pullover hoodie. thats why you need a bearskin hoodie that makes you look like a real man.

load more comments
view more: next ›