this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

52343 readers
605 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just found this project by browsing the mergerfs documentation. It claims to be an opensource fork of the Unraid software that makes it so flexible. The documentation isn't great, but has all the basic info to get going. It works kinda like Snapraid in that each disk has it's own filesystem and parity is calculated across all of the drives, but it happens in real time (unlike with snapraid).

Thoughts? comments? Would you trust this with important data?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Warning

☢️ This is an early-stage project, and while the driver and nmdctl management tool have been tested in both virtualized environments and some physical setups, data loss is still a possibility. This is mainly intended for DIY enthusiasts comfortable with Linux command line usage.

Use at your own risk, and always have backups!

No, I would not trust it with important data.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 8 points 16 hours ago

Yeah yeah yeah but ignoring that.... Would you?

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What is the gain compared to running something battle tested like zfs or mdraid?

[–] dont@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

The selling point of unraid is that you can mix and match different disk sizes and it figures out a (good, efficient?) way to handle them even as you grow a pool. You're not going to have a good time with a 1TB drive, a 2 TB drive and a 15 TB drive using zfs, unraid doesn't care... (Using and preferring zfs myself, by the way; this is heresay.)

[–] lime_red@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

ZFS AnyRaid soon?

[–] nickiam2@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Another benefit is if you lose your all parity disks and a data disk, you can still access the filesystem on the other data disks. So if the array fails, you don't lose all the data, just the 1 (failed) disk worth of files.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago

Ah, I can see the appeal but it's not for me then. :)

[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 1 points 16 hours ago

Cool idea!

But why would I use it? What advantage does I give me over traditional MD? The opportunity to use different filesystems on different disks? Or hot-add already formatted disks? I don't really get it.