this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
508 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

76415 readers
3850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (9 children)

This is so much bullshit. 4K does make a difference, specially if playing console games on a large TV (65" and up).

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Console games that all run at <720p getting upscaled to hell and back. We have come so far since the PS3 where games ran at <720p, but without upscaling. lol

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, my PS5 games are definitely not 720p

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hard disagree. 4K is stunning, especially Samsung’s Neo-QLED. I cannot yet tell a difference between 4K and 8K, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sure but, hear me out, imagine having most of your project sourcecode on the screen at the same time without having to line-wrap.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I've been using "cheap" 43" 4k TVs as my main monitor for over a decade now. I used to go purely with Hisense, they have great colour and PC text clarity, and I could get them most places for $250 CAD. But this year's model they switched from RGB subpixel layout to BGR, which is tricky to get working cleanly on a computer, even when forcing a BGR layout in the OS. One trick is to just flip the TV upside down (yes it actually works) but it just made the whole physical setup awkward. I went with a Sony recently for significantly more, but the picture quality is fantastic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

"No duh" -Most humans, since ever

I watch 576i DVDs on a 24" 1366x768 TV and I don't mind because I sit reasonably far.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is pretty obvious due to how they had to add HDR at the same time to sell it. The HDR was a real progression, but they wouldn’t get to sell you higher res Blu-ray formats and streaming packages with just that.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If you read RTINGS before buying a TV and setting it up in your room, you already knew this. Screen size and distance to TV are important for determining what resolution you actually need.

Most people sit way too far away from their 4K TV.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

4k is perfectly fine for like 99% of people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Sony Black Trinitron was peak TV.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

with all the menus now days I mainly want sharp text

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›