this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
72 points (92.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9281 readers
236 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

That imbalance represents a turnabout from August, when Newsom first moved his proposed map redraw towards the November ballot. At the time polls showed support for the measure, which became known as Prop 50, hovering precariously just over 50 percent. That appeared beatable by a campaign able to mobilize the Republican base while raising enough money to sway the relatively small slice of persuadable centrists.

Shout out to shitty polls for getting some fascist money wasted

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Why is this a LAMF topic? It's just politics. I'm in CA and haven't seen much advertising about Prop 50 btw.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Republicans redistricted to gain an advantage in the midterms assuming democrats wouldn’t. But they did.

Republicans never thought democrats would redistrict their districts.

[–] pricklypearbear@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You forgot to mention that the redistricting was in Texas.

California democrats decided to propose redistricting in response to Texas.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Multiple other Red states have gerrymandered or are in the process of gerrymandering in preparation for the 2026 midterm elections:

Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Virgina, Louisiana, Ohio, Kansas

California's likely redistricting will be more than counteracted in 2026.

Other Blue states besides California are behind the game, and are planning, along with more Red states, for mid-decade redistricting:

https://www.newsweek.com/redistricting-map-shows-states-planning-major-changes-10949573

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most red states have gerrymandered the shit out of their districts so they're not gonna be able to squeeze that many more seats. Blue states have a much better chance of counteracting those votes if they all do their own gerrymandering however.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 3 months ago

I hope you're right...

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

And California has the democracy to vote to fight back unlike Texas that the party chooses to do whatever they want.