this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
404 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76562 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google announced the end of support for early Nest Thermostats in a support document earlier this year that largely flew under the radar. As of October 25, first and second generation units released in 2011 and 2012, respectively, will be unpaired and removed from the Google Nest or Google Home app.

Users will no longer be able to control their thermostats remotely via their smartphone, receive notifications, or change settings from a mobile device. End-of-support also disables third-party assistants and other cloud-based features including multi-device Eco mode and Nest Protect connectivity.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago (11 children)

This is exactly why I didn't buy one of these or the Amazon version. I didn't trust that the devices would work as long as they could function and was correct.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I bought one a bunch of years ago. Maybe 10 years. It worked fine. Did it's thing. Then for no reason google chooses to kill it. Fool me once.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Then for no reason google chooses to kill it.

That's kind of their thing.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wondered how long it would take for that url to pop up. I will never ever rely on any Google product. Except maybe Gmail but I have an alternative plan should that go belly up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This isn’t “end of support.”

This is “loss of functionality.”

Totally inexcusable.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Samsung did something similar with one of their tablets when they remotely removed an app that provided an IR remote function - a primary reason for my purchase. Samsung's support not so politely told me, "Too fucking bad." when I objected.

There was something I could do about it though. Even though a replacement 3rd party app was less than $5 I haven't purchased another Samsung consumer product or service in almost a decade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. And even "loss of functionality" makes it sound passive; as if it just happened by accident. They Intentionally broke a working product.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Heh I guess this is my work self showing through. I’m a software developer and “loss of function” is a very severe term to me :D it’s only surpassed by loss of data, accessibility/legal issue, and security/privacy breach. On the less severe end we have loss of telemetry, degraded function (meaning there’s still a workaround) degraded performance, and finally cosmetic defect.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No it isn't. I have one of these, the only loss of function is remote internet settings, which was a stupid feature. It was an escalator, it's now become stairs. It still works fine as a thermostat, except Communist countries no longer know my house temperature.

Amazing how tech heads focus on minor shit like this with the long list of problems currently facing Fascist America.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Dumb thermostats last for multiple decades.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

As do smart thermostats that don't rely on the continued goodwill of any corporation to function.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 8 points 3 days ago

I've got one of those with bi-metallic strips, it's 35 years old, works no problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is an open source project to replace the innards:

https://sett.homes/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] comador@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Jokes on them, I block my Nest from talking to the Internet so my electrical company cannot control the damned thing. They had control even after I opted out and Google insisted they unenrolled me in the energy savings plan. Don't enroll in these plans [insert it's a trap gif].

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This sort of thing is one of the reasons I chose a RainMachine irrigation controller over other options, because they specifically marketed their cloud-independent firmware design. It was vindicated a couple years ago when they started going defunct and grasped for recurring revenue by billing for proxied remote access, but even then they emphasized that everything else would continue to function without their servers.

The onus is on the consumer to reward cloud-independent designs like this. While it has been sad to see RainMachine’s collapse, my device indeed just keeps working. Hopefully it isn’t ultimately killed by firmware or app security vulnerabilities since it’s now thoroughly unmaintained.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›