this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
584 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76665 readers
2619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Handing online servers over to consumers could carry commercial or legal risks, she said, in addition to safety concerns due to the removal of official company moderation.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mjr@infosec.pub 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Digital ownership? Games producers want to own players' fingers now? I guess that's slightly better than cutting their ears off.

[–] Klear@quokk.au 3 points 3 days ago

I don't dig it. I don't dig it at all.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You know, I have purchased around 200 games. I have no idea how many of those can be mine because they're linked to a store, maintained (usually) by a corporation hellbent on optimised profits, subject to mandatory updates so I have no choice but to play the way they want me to, and I don't have the space to store them all. I don't feel like any of them are really owned by me (and I know this is true but I reject that notion), not until they're transferred to an offline machine.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They're not owned by you. You own a license to use them. Some stores, like GOG, give you a less restrictive license, but it's still a license.

[–] Ksin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

GoG does actually explicitly state that you own the games bought on the platform, though who knows how well that holds in a strictly legal sense.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 day ago

You’re not allowed to distribute GoG games so you don’t own them.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

and the law is able to make license conditions illegal/unenforceable (like non-compete clauses in employment contracts)

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but has the law made licenses for software illegal/unenforceable? No.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

literally what STG is about

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool, and no laws have been changed, and it's debatable if any should.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this entire thread is about the STG petition, and thus about the theoretical possibility of how laws could change

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›