this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
649 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

76665 readers
3382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I wish people were as outraged about people getting killed by human drivers. The safety record of these cars has been no less than stellar until now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Rest in peace kitkat

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.” – Exodus 21:23-24

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

A cat for a cat, but it's an EV, so there is no catalytic converter to take

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 12 points 2 days ago

There might be some CAT6 cable inside somewhere

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Cat's shouldn't be left outside in the first place, because of situations like this.

*"Cat's shouldn't be left outside because they'll be crushed by a vehicle, eaten by coyotes, catch a deadly disease or purposely killed by shitty humans."

I can never understand why this is so often a hot take other than "it's natural", which is dubious at best. Leaving a cat outside by itself, without supervision and a harness is irresponsible and stupid. If you or your family do that, in a city, then make sure to have some "missing cat" posters pre-printed and always keep the picture up to date because that cat will likely not live a full life. Kindly keep any anecdotal evidence to the contrary to yourself, it stands for nothing.

Maybe if you lived on a farm and you wanted it to keep the mice population down, but then there's the environmental factor of how cats kill a lot of birds which stresses an already stressed population (and is maybe detrimental to crop health re. insects).

/rant

Fully agree, this not only highlights the dangers of driverless vehicles but also highlights the fact cats shouldn't be allowed outside.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regicide.

A feline queen reigns over my apartment complex. It's a fair regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some of us are old enough to remember how cats and other creatures would get killed by old car engine designs with the large open fan driven by a belt. They would sleep on that fan housing and not realize the danger when the car was started. So there have been improvements that have helped, maybe not necessarily for that reason. For what it's worth, I'm on the side of minimizing cars for so many reasons, but it has been worse for animals in the past.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (8 children)

There is probably an elevated risk of killing cats in any electric vehicle because there are fewer signs that the car is "on" and about to drive.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I trust the kind of person who was perfectly fine with robotaxi's until an animal was killed. Seems they don't' really have a good grasp on the problems of a car-centric society of which road-kill is a very minor one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Let cats use them as litter boxes. Cats' revenge.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Highlighting individual cases like this is a good way to capture human emotions but the focus should be on the big picture. The moment a self driving car is statistically safer than a human driver it becomes the objectively better alternative. The fact that accidents will still keep happening nevertheless isn't a reason to revert back to human drivers.

This same "trick" is used in charity advertisements: starving kid will capture the attention of people but a starving village will not despite the fact that it contains that same kid.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Good call out of the identifiable victim effect and the affect heuristic, where decisions are driven by emotional responses rather than objective analysis of risks or benefits.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›