this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
691 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

76770 readers
2283 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DW: Fast charging over 2 years only degraded the battery an extra 0.5%, even on extremely fast charging Android phones using 120W.

And with that, hopefully we can put this argument to rest.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is the type of scientific method that can put all this nonsense to rest. I really appreciate their work proving that the difference between fast/slow/30-80% is insignificant to the majority of people.

Thanks!

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 7 points 3 days ago

Battery lore has been cargo-cult woo since the NiMH days... most of it feels like manufacturers saying "oh, I'm sorry you didn't get our advertised life, you must have done something wrong."

[–] warm@kbin.earth 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This isn't a fair like-to-like test though. They used iPhones, which use one battery and then for their 120W test they used iQOO 7, which has two batteries that charge in parallel. They aren't testing the charge rate effects on a single battery, but just how different phones behave.

While it's an okay test to see how certain models of phones hold up, it's not a test for longevity of a single battery using fast and and not-as-fast charging.

So the title, as it often is these days on YouTube, is misleading.

[–] BritishJ@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No they did a fast and slow charging group for iPhone, and also did a fast and slow charging group for Androids. Did you not pay attention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And with that, hopefully we can put this argument to rest.

wow... the idea that the anecdotal evidence of some youtuber should be the proof, not the engineering and chemistry knowledge of people who designed the battery and charging system and know how it works, is on par with the belief that global warming is caused by farts of the turtles carrying the earth. sad noises.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

That's a great TL:DW;

Now I want an iPhone that can charge in 20 minutes. :)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He he Xiaomi 120 watt charge. 19 minutes from zero to full. Well I only have tried from like 12% to 80+ because that was more than enough and I wont let it go to zero-zero. I don't use it regularly, not because I fear for my battery but it does get the phone warm and warm/cool cycles are bad for electronics.

The day the battery degrades I'll just have it swapped for a new one, I think we're far enough into the battery revolution to no longer really care about all this any more.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's pretty awesome

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›