this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
388 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

76808 readers
4023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Disturbing. What is the proposed mechanism here? Or is it unknown?

load more comments (3 replies)

Ooh yay, more ways for employer's AI to autoreject people! How fun!

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think Lenin (for all his problems), had a good criticism of the economist though I can't find a great source for it

[–] Postimo@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

The Economist, a journal that speaks for the British millionaires, is pursuing a very instructive line in relation to the war.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1915/may/01c.htm

For all his problems??

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Is that...an AI generated image?

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The Economist is generally a pretty good news source, but I thought this article was subpar.

Irrespective of whether this facial evaluation algorithm works or not, as things stand today, it is pointless to discuss its use in the context of meritocracy. A regime founded upon the rejection of personal responsibility, corruption and criminality makes such discussions irrelevant (algorithm or no algorithm).

At the risk of sounding like an accelerationist, I can't get rid of the feeling that the regime members are really busy doing their best to make a new metaphorical rope.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›