this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
929 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76949 readers
3510 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft's AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman, has shared his opinion after recent pushback from users online that are becoming frustrated with Copilot and AI on Windows. In a post on X, Suleyman says he's mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

His post comes after Windows president Pavan Davuluri was recently met with major backlash from users online for posting about Windows evolving into an agentic OS. His post was so negatively received that he was forced to turn off replies, though Davuluri did later respond to reassure customers that the company was aware of the feedback.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

These companies are monopolistic dynasties. They set the precedent and shove it down our throats until the next generation, which doesn't know a world prior to the slop they've sold us. They have a captive market in waiting, and the finances to survive until then.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yes, because your bank account depends on your incredulity.

Fuck all the way off.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Arguments about the validity of it being impressive aside, I think he's mistaking impressive technological achievements with things people want in their operating system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

That fluency is a pure illusion. Either he doesn't know this, or he thinks we don't.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 75 points 1 day ago (22 children)

It is interesting to see his reaction to reality. He finds out that people think he's peddling bullshit, and instead of asking why they think that, he dismisses them as irrational... That's one way to run a company, but only if your company has a monopoly and customers can't run away even if they want to.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His comparison to snake on his Nokia is actually good because in its current state AI is like a little gimmick for many users. Sure there are use cases but it can't reliably perform any truly critical tasks because it makes terrible mistakes.

Imagine Nokia shoving snake in customers faces as it is being done with AI. Every phone marketed as OPTIMIZED FOR SNAKE. A big snake button on the phone as a shortcut to open it. Snake integrated everywhere. Trying to send a text? Would you like to play a round of snake first?

That's what AI currently feels like.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 14 points 1 day ago

they even have an AI CEO

clowns

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My mind would be blown if the computer always answered correctly.

I am unimpressed because a majority of answers are at least slightly bullshit, and very often they are entirely incorrect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 247 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Microsoft is truly the king of putting out a product that no one wanted or asked for, then wondering why no one wants it. I'm sure they will soon begin the second phase of any Microsoft product: spending a small country's GDP marketing it to try to get people to use it, despite it being prominently displayed on approximately 5 billion operating systems already.

A tried and true strategy to piss through more money than god to justify spending more money than god building the thing that no one wants. Looking at you, IE and edge.

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 113 points 2 days ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Talking fluently". You get completely meaningless answers. Big walls of text without content.

AI is a hindrance, not a helper.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 122 points 2 days ago (3 children)

people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

I already communicate fluently with my computer. I double click an icon to communicate to my computer "open this". I type into a search field to communicate "find this string".

At no point do I want to communicate to my computer "log everything I do, then use those logs to give me something that isn't what I'm asking for."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're "mindblown" about this then you shouldn't be the CEO of any division of one of the most profitable businesses on the planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 88 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Pro tip: when your customers don’t like your product, it’s not their fault. It’s yours, and the appropriate response is not complaining or incredulity that people don’t like it. The appropriate response is to change the product or scrap it completely.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"The customer is always right" might get misused a lot, but it is correct in this instance.

If a lot of your customers don't like something, it's not something wrong with the customers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mangoguana@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Honestly I stopped using the OS because of the ads, it was such a ballsy move to keep spamming me with "use one drive" "try edge" "look at alllll theses aaaappppsssz that yoouuuu can pay for" or even "activate windows" my OS is my home not your billboard ffs

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Because doubling down on idiocy has always worked in the past.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Don't you have phones" moment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm impressed by AI, but I don't want AI, now go away, you're just as annoying as that blabbermouth droid and that creepy paperclip.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nightlily@leminal.space 118 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don’t want to talk fluently with a computer, I want it to do things deterministically in a way I as a human being cannot. If I want a discussion, I have it with a human being.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 137 points 2 days ago (28 children)

You know what would impress me? That I would be able to start using my computer when I boot it in the morning.

As it stands I have to wait some 5 to 10 minutes before the mouse pointer decides to cooperate with me. And god forbid I attempt to start a Teams meeting, either the camera, mic or screen share will not work at all.

What the hell is this dumbass operating system doing that is more important than responding to the damn user?

Same machine, booting Linux, lets me start working right away. No stuttering, no freezes. Go figure.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 91 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's sad that all of those things were solved problems 20 years ago.

Like, Skype was usable on pretty much any computer with a webcam in 2006. Computers booted in a couple minutes with their spinning disk drives.

The tech is faster, more reliable, higher resolution, etc, but the software is fucking ass.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And once again, Ed Zitron is proven right about the Business Idiots running everything. Jesus fuck these MBAbros are so fucking stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 160 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Well my guy have you actually used and I mean really sat down and used your burning pile of slop for an excuse of an OS? I bet you haven‘t because you don‘t have to. Your assistants have to deal with that and they get paid to not complain about it. Meanwhile you get paid to waste oxygen and have lost touch with reality to the point you‘re no longer able to contribute to society in your current position. How sad.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, I don't want to destroy the only environment where I can live to fuel AIs that only make rich people richer. How silly of me.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He might be the dumbest ceo out there, and that is an impressive feat.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Nope. Ballmer is and always will be the all time king R. He's the dude that had MS pilot away from handheld devices because nobody will ever use cell phones. This was when MS was the only credible mobile OS. He oversaw Vista, he oversaw 8, both of which were complete disasters.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Truly disconnected.

[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Talentless hack and way out of his depth grifter who knows the position he has reached and the money he makes in it is really just supported by cultivated connections and his bullshiting ability, rather than any superior strategical capabilities, when the business "strategy" he chose as CEO merelly because "everybody else is doing it" starts to be perceived as not just broken but a bit of a shit show, keeps on trying to push the impression that, actually, he's just a misunderstood visionary and it's others that don't yet recognize how wonderful the direction he chose for the company is.

By using such arguments, maybe once again he'll "fake it until you make it" his way into success (after all, that's how he became MS' CEO in the first place) or, at worst, it will extend how long he can keep on getting paid the big bucks for nothing more than being a lucky bullshitter with the right connections.

I've been in Tech on and off since the 90s, including in Tech Startups, and nowadays "leaders" in it are pretty much all grifters, not techies with a vision.

I've been reading the posts here and most people are coming from a "decent honest person trying to do his jobs as well as possible" point of view in their reading of the guy (probably because that's the kind of person they are) and thus giving this guy the benefit of the doubt, whilst from what I've seen in that world this guy is almost certainly a talentless hack at anything other than grifting and who, lacking any above average strategical thinking abilities, went for the "everybody else is doing it" strategy which is now blowing up, so of course he'll use typical grifter skills to try and dig his way out of that hole or, at least, stave off the innevitable end of getting big fat $$$ for holding a position he's not actually competent at.

The guy is gaslighting because he's a grifter not a strategist and the "it's others, not me" line of argument is a common "defend & delay" tool in a grifter's toolbox.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Didn't manufacture enough consent. That's on you

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I don't think I know anyone who has been excited for a single microsoft product in the last ~15 years. It's never "wow, that's cool", it's "I wonder how they fucked it up this time".

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›