this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
115 points (89.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44432 readers
1074 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Per the title. If an animal dies out in nature without any human involvement, shouldn't it be considered vegan to harvest any of the useful parts from it (not nessicarily meat, think hide), since there was no human-caused suffering involved?

Similarly, is driving a car not vegan because of the roadkill issue?

Especially curious to hear a perspective from any practicing moral vegans.

Also: I am not vegan. That's why I'm asking. I'm not planning on eating roadkill thank you. Just suggesting the existence of animal-based vegan leather.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 12 hours ago

Found RFK, Jr's Lemmy account

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Vegan just means causing as little animal suffering as possible. Us existing in a capitalist society causes suffering for animals. But where it is possible to avoid it, it should be avoided is what vegans want. Like if a vegan drives a car and a squirrel runs in front of the car the person does not suddenly stop being vegan

[–] Dingleberrydipndots@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What if that person had no remorse for the squirrel?

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You mean it's not Scott Pilgrim rules?

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Cars and roads cause a lot of suffering for animals in general

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I would think driving a car is not vegan because it’s fueled by dead dinosaurs.

[–] msage@programming.dev 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

It was a lame attempt at humor since it’s called fossil fuel… I know oil primarily came from ancient algae and plankton that died and sank to the ocean floor.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you don't like broccoli, why don't you eat it when it's half rotten?

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

You missed this part in the post:

"not necessarily meat, think hide"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Veganism isn't a hivemind. We're all individuals that came to similar conclusions. And we will have different opinions on the details.

Some folks will say consuming those that died naturally is a-ok. Others will argue that it incentivizes creating conditions under which animals die "naturally" to harvest them.
Personally, I'm part of the group that is probably the largest by a long shot, whose opinion is: Why are we even thinking about that?

The vast majority of vegans find corpses gross, much like anything you might derive from corpses.
It also seriously does not happen often, that animals drop dead in front of you. And there's nothing on an animal's body that you can't find a different alternative for. So, it really just is not a relevant question in our lives...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why don't you eat humans if they've already died?

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because I'm not allowed in the morgue anymore.

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You made me literally laugh out loud. Thank you

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

prion disease lol

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I would totally try it if it was legally allowed and there wasn't a risk of diesease from eating human flesh. 🤷‍♂️

And, if in a situation like the Donner Party: That's generally what happens. They don't kill someone just to eat 'em.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] webp@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Because of the karma loss 🙄

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've wondered about this myself since like age 7, when our otherwise perfectly healthy horse Sissy got struck by lightning while standing under a pine tree out in the field in a storm. 😢

Living out in deer hunting country, they could have given the neighbors a shout and basically be like hey the meat's fresh, y'all come help cut it up and stock like 10-20 freezers for free..

🤷

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

You probably don't want to eat horse meat these days due to the drugs that are often given to horses, (mostly wormers). They tend to not flush out of the horses system no matter how long you wait.

[–] python@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Really depends on which lens of veganism you view it through. I usually judge things by the economic lens, where veganism is the response to capitalism incentivising the exploitation of animals. It's probably one of the easiest ways to think about it, but essentially it goes like "As long as you don't pay money for exploitation, you're fine"
So roadkill would be fine. Saving food that would be thrown out is fine. Shoplifting is fine. Served the wrong thing at the restaurant- Complain and get your money back. Second hand down jacket from a relative who would have thrown it away otherwise - gross but fine. Stealing chickens from a factory farm and eating some of their eggs- fine. Et cetera.

I don't think that sort of logical line can be applied to anything but individuals though. I still wouldn't be buying leather from a company that claims to only use roadkill, as my money would still be a financial incentive to expand the operation.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because animals that died naturally are animals

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So is the point to NOT eat animals or not cause suffering?

I'm all for #2 but #1 seems arbitrary given nature.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Being vegan means not consuming animal products. The reasons are irrelevant in the definition

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

The reasons are not irrelevant to the question being asked though. Vegan for health reasons? Sure the question is irrelevant if you get sick from any animal products. You aren't going to eat them. Same way celiac avoids gluten.

Vegan for ethical reasons? Then the question is very relevant. Is it ethical to have a pet cat? They are carnivores and will suffer and die on the wrong food. No pets at all would be most ethical. Are you concerned about mass farming of vegetables? If machinery is used, field mice and such are getting killed to harvest your vegan diet. Are you concerned about human trafficking of migrant workers or just farmed animals? If a bear kills a deer in your yard in Montana, eats half and fucks off, is it ethical for you to eat the rest? You had no hand in it's death and suffering. You'll have to do something with the carcass or you'll have more predators in your yard. Are you only eating locally grown, in season fruits and vegetables, hand harvested by fairly paid workers?

If ethics is the reason, it's fully legitimate to debate and figure out where your personal line is drawn. We live in an imperfect world and there's no perfect solution.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Well that's just dumb.

load more comments
view more: next ›