this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
485 points (98.2% liked)

Selfhosted

53199 readers
2094 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plex is starting to enforce its new rules, which prevent users from remotely accessing a personal media server without a subscription fee.

If anyone needs it: https://jellyfin.org/

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 137 points 1 day ago (49 children)

Why would anyone use Plex over jellyfin anyway? The writing was on the wall years ago.

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 104 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I set up Plex on my mum's TV and she can just push play. The UI is intuitive (read: familiar) to her.

Jellyfin has a reputation for giving users more control and customizability, but the other side of that coin is that it's more "fiddly".

My users don't want to fiddle.

[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

This is legit the opposite of my experience. I am a relatively tech savvy user, I like to fiddle with all the settings and an ugly UI doesn't inherently deter me as long as the experience is good, so when I first installed jellyfin I was ready to have a clunky experience fighting the UI.

Despite that, I was legitimately surprised at how Jellyfin was far less confusing for me to use out of the box than plex ever was. I found Plex's UI very confusing to navigate on my TV and my family did not like using it either. I remember especially hating all the extra categories and freemium content plex added that I wasn't interested in viewing but couldn't remove (or at least did not find a way to remove). In Jellyfin all of my content is just there and very easily categorized and there's no superfluous elements in the UI, just my stuff that I want to watch.

I remember plex also gave me more trouble during installation than jellyfin did. I actually found jellyfin very pleasant and intuitive to setup. Plex sent me down a Google rabbit hole to diagnose why it wouldn't boot at all.

It was genuinely such an awful experience as a first-time user that it made me wonder why anyone would use plex.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (9 children)

That's the opposite of my experience. Jellyfin just works and immediately exposes the content we're looking for, plex tries overloading you with bullshit and burying your actual content

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DancingTable@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Skip intro on Apple TV not working on Jellyfin is probably the #1 reason I do not use it.

When tvOS 26.2 comes out I will tentatively test Jellyfin + Infuse, but until then, Jellyfin is a non-starter for me.

But I use Emby over Plex so still not using Plex.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Shout to another Emby user!

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Plex is more polished, jellyfin is basically functional but we use Plex in our household because we watch movies all the time. I have my own personal jellyfin server on an old computer

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it is that is more polished, it's just you pay for them to do the stuff you need to do yourself with reverse proxying, opening ports, securing stuff. This is only an issue if you are sharing outside your network of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (33 children)

Because I don't have to learn about things like proxies to try and open the service up outside my network in a secure manner or try to explain to family they need to run tailscale at the same time and then inevitably have to provide tech support for another aspect of "why is this not working?"

I just check allow remote access and it just works and I can go about my day doing things I enjoy more because fucking about with Linux and providing tech support are pretty low on that list for me :)

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 11 hours ago

Why bother self hosting at all then? Paying somone else to do it for you and the deal constantly getting altered is pretty what you signed up for.

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Are there legal ways today to have your own media server serving new TV shows? I see the point if you're sailing the high seas, but curios if there's other uses for one (for videos)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] littleomid@feddit.org 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Am I the only one who thinks jellyfin is not only superior to pure, but also way more intuitive to setup? I still don’t understand how plexs routing works, and why I need a central account in order to connect to my own server.

[–] fluffy@feddit.org 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Probably not the only one, but configuring your server for outside access is way easier with Plex.

Since I mainly use these services for streaming my music collection (long time cd collector), I declare that Plexamp is simply superior to jellyfin. It is really awesome and feature-rich and jellyfin does not even come close to Plexamp regarding music in my opinion.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago (16 children)

Is it more intuitive to set up for remote streaming to friends...? That's the use case here and as far as I know the answer is a big "no".

[–] discomatic@lemmy.ca 7 points 18 hours ago

I got Jellyfin set up and available for streaming in less than two hours. Plex kept demanding that my friend buy a pass to download something, so I was like, nah. Jellyfin works flawlessly and is (in my opinion) a far superior option. I constantly had issues with Plex.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I’ve never used jellyfin, but do they also host proxy servers? AFAIK plex does and its costing them money, hence the need for paywalling this. You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

You can still use tailscale and reverse proxy to allow remote streaming

I used to use Plex and when I discovered there was paid remote streaming function - that goes through their servers - my reactions were "Haha, no"* and checking whether my existing WireGuard setup would do it instead.

Whaddya know, remote streaming using Plex and PlexAmp at no cost.


*Not because I begrudge them recouping costs, but because it's designed that way to justify charging for it, gives them whatever information they want from my viewing, and it's not self-hosting if there's any third party cloud/account component to it.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Jellyfin does not host anything. With this change free Plex users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) and Jellyfin users behind a reverse proxy (or VPN) work the same for remote access.

The only difference is that Plex no longer provides expensive services for free, while Jellyfin never provided them.

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

This is my understanding and I’m surprised with the negative reaction. I think jellyfin is the better alternative being FOSS but this is not the reason.

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

Enshittification intensifies

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Plex is not free. Plex is paid software, just like Google Photos or iCloud. The only free software is open source. Open source everything. Doesn’t matter if the client is open source. If the server isn’t, it’s not open source. (I’M LOOKING AT YOU, SNAP!)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›