this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
870 points (98.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8228 readers
1333 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

Yes it is piggy.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Fun Fact, since executive orders really only apply to the operations of the federal government and its employees, the Tariffs aren't actually legal.

Big shipping magnates and importers could probably sue the federal government over any attempt to enforce the tariff, ignoring them all the while.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This tweet is essentially:

You promised to lower prices, but prices went up, this is NOT what I voted for.

For it to be LAMF, you have to actually get what you're expecting others to get. The person you voted for NOT doing what they promised to do is literally the opposite of LAMF.

Basically:

I voted for the Leopards Eating Faces party, I never thought they'd...wait, they're not eating anyone's faces

is the equivalent of the situation happening here.

Not LAMF.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You're not wrong. I'd say this post is LAMF adjacent. Not directly LAMF.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think even 'adjacent' is giving it too much credit.

After all, what's happened is the literal opposite of what they wanted, while LAMF requires that the thing you supported happening is what happens, you just thought it'd happen to others and not you.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Trump promised to do tariffs. People assumed other countries would pay the cost so that was good. It turns out they are paying the cost.

It would be straight up LAMF if the tariffs were front of mind when they voted. But inflation was what they were most concerned with, and they either didn't pay attention to Trump's tariff talk or assumed it wouldn't be them paying the tariffs... you could say it's not directly LAMF because people don't understand the connection between higher tariffs and higher prices, but definitely LAMF adjacent because of the widespread assumption that people in other countries would be paying the tariffs, not them.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

patriotic but doesn't want to support american business?

that's called being a dumb bitch, and you can quote me on that

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Mr. President, this is NOT what I voted for.

Yes it is. This is exactly what you voted for. Trump 1 told you exactly how Trump 2 was going to go. We're all eating shit, but I am happy your shit sandwich is slightly more unpalatable to you.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Reality is the president doesn't, or more accurately, shouldn't control the economy.

...Perhaps utterly worshipping one man was not the best idea? As history has repeatedly shown?

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh boy, history repeatedly shows how everything goes south.

This mantra of individual responsibility is getting the US nowhere. Billionaires learned how to work collectively while one half of Americans blamed the other half for the problems the billionaires invented. Get your shit together and stop blaming your neighbor

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I meant indviduals more than individualism.

This feels like religious worship, or influencer worship, to me. At least for some people I've observed.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

What do you think happens when a candidate receives enormous financial support and is somewhat charismatic? It's not these people who complain about the groceries to blame.

[–] LaMouette@jlai.lu 8 points 10 hours ago

Same dinner two years in a row, this is some true conservative vibe !

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

American? Or... Bangladeshi, Indian Kenyan, or maybe Russian?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Let's be real, if the media called import taxes "import taxes" and not "teriffs" Trump's import tax campaign would've much more rapidly collapsed

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen 5 guys praying together with a single woman. Well it looked like she was praying for a few minutes.

[–] YerLam@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Oh God" is a prayer right? In that cases she was praying again and again and again.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Guys can only pray with 5 guys at one time unless the other guys are praying too with others. Yeah they usually also scream oh god too.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

She voted for the racism. Not the taxes.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Mr. President, this is NOT what I voted for.

"Karma is an ancient Indian concept that refers to an action, work, or deed, and its effect or consequences.... [It's] often descriptively called the principle of karma, wherein individuals' intent and actions (cause) influence their future "

In the Bible it sez something like "As you vote, so shall you reap!"

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

I feel like some of the people here should consider why we all know she would vote the same way if an election was held immediately after making this post.

They are getting something that they desire more than lower grocery costs or anything sane things any sane person would value.

They are getting to hurt marginalized people with their votes.

This is their single voter issue, and its the reason why no matter how much they've shot themselves in the foot, they'll buy that 500 dollar advil their insurance denied coverage for and load up another shell.

They don't evaluate politicians based on if they're happy. They evaluate politicians based on if who they hate feel sad.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] watson@lemmy.world 196 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course it is. Also, you knew better, but you did it anyway.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She didn't knew better because she is dumb though.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 47 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I bet someone she knows explained it to her, but rather than let herself be convinced, she doubled down.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"this is NOT what I thought I voted for when I knowingly voted to be taxed on all foreign food and to lock up the people picking domestic food" ...Well, then what did you think you were voting for?

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

when I knowingly voted to be taxed on all foreign food

You're assuming "knowingly". Trump told people tariffs were going to lower costs, falsely claiming that the foreign countries would be picking up that tab. If person X doesn't independently know/learn that tariffs basically never work that way, then the OP reaction makes perfect sense.

This also isn't LAMF at all—LAMF is about supporting something being done, but expecting (without evidence) that it will only be done to Others, and not you. She obviously didn't support raising prices at all—the person you voted for NOT doing as they promised is failing to meet the most fundamental requirement for an LAMF situation.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I'd be curious to find out what all of these "this is not what I voted for" people thought they were actually voting for and why they thought that

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

After Covid the recovery was K shaped. So the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. Trump was hammering out covid benefits, which actually helped a lot of people and before that the economy was doing well. A good bit of that was that Obama left it that way and the Republicans were divided enough to stop Trump from being as bad as he is today.

So a lot of them just looked back and saw that they did better under Trump then Biden and voted for Trump.

(Biden tried to do industrial policy, but that takes time, was delayed and money was spend baldy due to corruption. However the general plan was decent.)

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago

Trump promised to lower prices. A complaint after he is in office about rising prices should make it very obvious what those people thought they were voting for.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They thought abusing brown people would magically fix all the things they told were bad like universal healthcare, feeding children, and safety regulations.

They actually thought things would be cheaper with tariffs because Trump said so. They are hateful morons.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 7 points 21 hours ago

They are not even thinking that deep. They just think handing assholes with power even more power is how to create more prosperity.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

They were voting for racism

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

A con man conned you and bankrupted the country that’s exactly what you voted for 3 times

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Waahhh... Cry harder magat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 71 points 1 day ago

ok, cool, now stfu and go back to foxnews and church; u must be exhausted after your heroic tweeting.

load more comments
view more: next ›