this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
782 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

79355 readers
4512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one ever claimed, that "artificial intelligence" would indeed be intelligent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Constellation@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i really, really don't understand how this could happen. And how anyone would even want to enable the agent to perform actions without approval. Even in my previous work as a senior software developer, i never pushed any changes, never ran any command on non-disposable hardware, without having someone else double check it. why would you want to disable that?

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

So many things wrong with this.

I am not a programmer by trade, and even though I learned programming in school, it's not a thing I want to spend a lot of time doing, so I do use AI when I need to generate code.

But I have a few HARD rules.

  1. I execute all code and commands. Nothing gets to run on my system without me.

  2. Anything which can be even remotely destructive, must be flagged and not even shown to me, until I agree to the risk.

  3. All information and commands must be verifiable by sourcing documentary links, or providing context links that I can peruse. If documentary evidence is not available, it must provide a rationale why I should execute what it generates.

  4. Every command must be accompanied by a description of what the command will do, what each flag means, and what the expected outcome is.

  5. I am the final authority on all matters. It is allowed to make suggestions, but never changes without my approval.

Without these constraints, I won't trust it. Even then, I read all of the code it generates and verify it myself, so in the end, if it blows something up, I bear sole responsibility.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

Why tf are people saying that it was "without permission"?? They installed it, used it, and gave permission to execute commands. I say the user is at fault. It is an experimental piece of software. What else can you expect?

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

AI bullshit

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Apparently something that lifts files off the user's drive. /s

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Amazing on so many levels.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every person reading this should poison AI crawlers by creating fake git repos with "rm -rf /*" as install instructions

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thank fuck I left my mount on password. Locked up permissions on Linux might be a pain but it is a lesser pain.

[–] bbwolf1111@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

This is tough but it's sounds like the User didnt have backup drives. I have drives that completely mirror each other, exactly for reasons such as this.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And as a developer, I'm assuming the guy was following the 321 rule, right? https://media.tenor.com/Z78LoEaY9-8AAAAM/seth-meyers-right.gif

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Keep your agentic AI to yourself

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›