this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1490 readers
27 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typical of this Labor govt, this policy is about appearing to do something, than actually doing it effectively.

Why not have levies for all houses sitting vacant, not just foreign owned? Why not make annual fees higher and higher if you own more than say 3 properties? How about fees for land banking in cities ?

Also better make sure that a house used for air BNB 2 weeks a year doesn't count as being used.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if they can appeal to people's xenophobia to deflect from the problems of landlords and capitalism in general then they'll do that. Gotta keep capitalism chugging along, even while they tut-tut about all the problems it's causing.

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

r/Canada making more sense after reading this comment

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

GIVE. US. A. DOBBERS. LINE.

Just about everyone in the fucking street will know if a place is vacant

[–] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why just foreign investors?

Because half the parliament & senate has investment properties and they don't want any responsibilities to actually rent them out to the plebs?