this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
569 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
2979 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Larry Ellison can fuck off while we're at it, the meddling technofascist bastard. Hope he loses everything!

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I'm as atheistic as they come but I'll maybe ask a demiurge for that to happen.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 76 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Can we do away with trillion dollar companies already,. please? They're not doing anything good for anyone, it always ends with some CEO's and shareholders enriching themselves over the backs of others

No company should ba r a worth of more than a billion dollars

No single person should have a net worth of over 10 million

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mickus@sh.itjust.works 64 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Where the fuck do they get this money from? $300 billion is fucking nuts. And 1.4 trillion in costs is literally bigger than my countries' entire GDP (Australia)

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The 1% is willing to pay whatever imaginary fiat currency they can to eliminate the need for the working class. Then they can finally get rid of us.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While simultaneously acting like a bunch of whining little crybabies about declining fertility rates.

Which is it: AI (and other automation) will replace jobs, or there aren't enough people to work all the jobs?

[–] tlmcleod@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hedging their bets. They're only capable of being sure of the future as the next person, which isn't very capable at all. But they have the ill-gotten means to back both sides so they continue to be on top.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh I know what they're doing. I just don't give a shit and will point out how ridiculous their sense of entitlement is.

No one is owed another human being.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Financial engineering, and they are one of the biggest producers of computer hardware for a long time. There's more business and personal consumers than ever. Everyone's getting online now, and the AI purchasing frenzy is helping a lot.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, it's called One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison, after all... 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

probably borrowing from large banks, selling shares, or bonds, or offering something as COLLATERAL.

[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

And ripping off their customers.

[–] orange@communick.news 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Any combination of:

  • Issue new shares and sell them
  • Issue corporate bonds and sell them
  • Borrow money from banks
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 70 points 2 days ago (9 children)

OpenAI’s mounting costs — set to hit $1.4 trillion

Sorry, but WTF!? $1.4 Trillion in costs? How are they going to make all of that back with just AI?

I think there's only one way they can make this back: if AI gets so good they can really replace most employees.

I don't think it will happen, but either way it's going to be an economic disaster. Either the most valuable companies in the world, offering services that the next couple of hundred companies in the world depend on, are suddenly bankrupt. Or suddenly everybody is unemployed.

[–] oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

How are they going to make all of that back with just AI?

Government bailouts is how.

Socialism for the rich, dog-eat-dog capitalism for everyone else.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

1,400,000,000,000

I used to be amazed at how much a billion was, but this many 0s makes my head explode.

These must be bubble inflated costs to match the bubble inflated revenue.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

One million seconds is 11.5 days, one billion seconds is 31.7 years, and one telling seconds is 31,700 years.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If LLMs fail and they invested: bailout

If LLMs succeed and they invested: rich

If LLMs fail and they passed: everyone else bailed out

If LLMs succeed and they passed: out of business

Therefore, the logical choice for a business is to invest in LLMs. The only mechanism to not do the stupid thing that everyone else is doing is gone.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

that assumes every business which invests in AI would be bailed out, which is a huge assumption. I would guess the only businesses that would receive bailouts would be those with personal ties to the government

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How is a haunted typewriter supposed to replace all those employees?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

I’ve tried explaining AI to people before and only could get so far before they fall back on “but it’s magic dude” but I love the idea of explaining it as a haunted typewriter.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

holy cow haunted typewriter is punching way above its weight class. Phenomenal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago

its a ponzi scheme.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Prediction: the bubble is real but financiers will find ways to kick the bull down the road until they can force enough adoption & ad insertion to not lose out. The other option is that we pay it, of course. Takes on which is worse?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

They'll do both just like they did in 2007/2008. These AI companies and their investors will get bailed out while the rest of us lose our jobs and have to move back in with our parents in the van they already live in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 117 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Oh good. AI is collapsing and it's taking Oracle with it.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Me, watching my company pivot to their cloud infrastructure: haha, I'm in danger

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 50 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I understand why people keep using oracle, but i have never understood why anyone starts.

Because they have a series of ERP systems and services that some idiot CTO at the company looks at and goes: Yes, give me one of those.

Then once you're on that, you get pulled into more and more Oracle ecosystem shit and you think some day you'll have control and be able to get out. But you never do.

Oracle is like the loanshark of the tech industry.

Once you're in, you're in for life. Good fucking luck getting out.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] m33@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago

Can’t wait. Payback for Sun, for Java…

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 175 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Couldn't have happened to a worse company! Hope it hurts even worse later on and fractures the Execucultist's will to shill AI further. 😈

[–] alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (42 children)

300 billion on OpenAI? Why? LLMs in general are trash, but ChatGPT isn't even the best LLM

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Personally, I am eyeballs deep in this industry and even I’m now hoping to see it all burn to the ground. I’ve already concluded that I’ll never make it to retirement in my field, probably because of automation. Fuck ‘em all.

[–] xartle@reddthat.com 18 points 2 days ago

Same for me... It's depressing. And I no faith the government will do anything besides make it worse. If we're lucky we'll get the Expanse 's version of basic.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TotalCourage007@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Do y'all think investors will wake up and realize that techbros are a bunch of fraudster scammers? Oracle deserves bankruptcy for being stupid with money. All my homies hate the AI-Bubble.

Bro even the way journalists talk about AI like it being a bet couldn't be more obvious that it's all a scam. If this AI-Bubble is profitable where are the actual god damn profits.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 65 points 3 days ago

I wonder .. will it be another case of "Too Big To Fail" .. or will it be .. "Let The Market Decide"?

I'm guessing the answer depends on how many medals the CEO of Oracle can bestow upon the Orange.

Me .. cynical .. no .. just been here for a while.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If they kill oracle, will that kill the last Unix after IBM stole the parent OS of Solaris and put it into Novell's oubliette to reduce competition?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (31 children)

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman declared a “code red” last week as the upstart faces greater rivalry from Google, threatening its ability to monetize its AI products and meet its ambitious revenue targets.

Interesting that even Sam Altman is worried now!
AFAIK there are also problems that Chinese companies have their own tool chain, and are releasing high level truly open source solutions for AI.

Seems to me a problem for the sky high profits could be that it is hard to make AI lock in, like is popular with much software and cloud services. But with AI you can use whatever tool is best value, and switch to the competition whenever you want.

It's nice that it will probably be impossible for 1 company to monopolize AI, like Microsoft did with operating systems for decades.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

Pop it! Pop it! 💭

[–] manxu@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago

Honestly, tulips were a better investment than Tesla or OpenAI. In fact, the continued success of the latter two tells you by itself there is something deeply, seriously wrong with the stock markets and the economy as a whole.

Fuck yeah. More of this. A lot more.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

The sheer amount of AI slop shorts on YouTube must be generating entire dollars in revenue by now. Who isn't entertained and eagerly awaiting the next five million videos of the same scenario over and over again?

load more comments
view more: next ›