Would love more expert opinions about the different Firefox forks
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
574 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
77769 readers
2856 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
unfortunately other forks depend on mozilla survival for thier survival as forks.
Would love to see an iOS version. I do enjoy the FireFox functionality of seeing tabs on other devices easily.
load more comments
(4 replies)
I don't understand this part:
Waterfox’s governance has allowed it to do something no other fork has (and likely will not do) - trust from other large, imporant third parties which in turn has given Waterfox users access to protected streaming services via Widevine.
Widevine is the defacto standard proprietary technology for DRM-locked content. It's used by all the major streaming services like Netflix and Disney+. Without it, publishers would not make their content available to those platforms for fear of rampant piracy, especially for high quality and 4K content. I guess Widevine requires some sort of vetted relationship with any browser that wants to use their tech.
High quality with their shitty bitrate? Lmao.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Their deal with Google for Widevine is separate from Mozilla, basically.
Been using it since near the beginning. Glad to hear!