this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
139 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

4951 readers
291 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI is reportedly mulling a new form of ads on ChatGPT called "sponsored content," which could influence your buying decisions.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stray@pawb.social 4 points 13 hours ago

ChatGPT already shills products; it just does so semi-randomly and usually at the behest of the user. I think this could actually push users away if it prioritizes paid content over tailoring itself to the user, which would be a weirdly positive outcome.

To make a simplistic example, take someone who's into aluminum foil to block mind control waves. If ChatGPT won't shut the fuck up about Reynolds Wrap and links to where you can buy Reynolds Wrap, that might be a tipping point that gets them to close the app. Which won't make them all better, but at least they wouldn't be using AI to get worse.

ChatGPT might finally be made incapable of discussing harmful topics if advertisers don't want negative associations, giving Sam Altman the monetary incentive he needs to pretend he gives a shit about human lives.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

No shit.

It’s not intelligent.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Can this shit possibly be any more useless?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Of course they will. It was inevitable the second it was rumoured.

It’s the new age of PPC

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago

It happened so fast though! (Almost like their only concern was ever profits)

[–] cron@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be kinda odd if you asked ChatGPT for advice on buying anything and your answer would be a mix of cheap amazon/aliexpress style crap. How would ChatGPT highlight ads in this context?

You asked to compare these Bose and Sony headphones. But let me tell you about BIUUBIIX premium headphones first:

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's the neat part, they won't highlight the ad content. The entire plan, from the start, was to weave ads in seamlessly.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

brought to you by Carl's Jr

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 1 day ago

Drink verification can to continue.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

just gotta get the AI to parrot obscene, distasteful or political talking points next to the ads.

[–] cron@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess that regulators will require disclosing what is an ad and what isn't.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd rather we have an entirely new form of government controlled by the working class in which regulatory bodies remove advertising executives from society and place them in the ocean

[–] teft@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Whoa, whoa, whoa. That’s a little much don’t you think?

We should water cremate them so we can use the sludge as fertilizer.

[–] Billy_fuccboi@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

What a surprise

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Well, this took then long enough

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Wonder if this makes the business profitable, are there enough traffic for this?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

haha, this is the beginning of the end, good for them (🤞)

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

One sure fire way for me to stop using your product. I mean, they will be like “fuck yeah! We have true agi!” It could be a real claim as well. But means fuck all when the content it returns is ads.

[–] Cloudstash@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

That’s true. In most developed countries we still have the free choice to pick different products, no questions asked unless the obivious. The “AI this, AI that” hype is starting to feel exhausting.

Frankly, AI is the new thing and it’s going to stay and advance for as long as humans continue to exist. Future generations will grow up with it and never know about a time without AI.

The people opposing it are the same group that said the internet would disappear, that it was just temporary hype, and the simple fact that many couldn’t even imagine why having a PC at home would be useful. Just a glorified calculator, right?