this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
830 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82621 readers
3172 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Big tech boss tells delegates at Davos that broader global use is essential if technology is to deliver lasting growth

(page 5) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wow it really is heading towards crisis point when you have people saying "keep feeding the beast or it'll eat us".

[–] flowers_galore2@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

Good lord, this guy is the absolute ugliest spoiled toddler ever roaming the planet, crying that he wants canndddyyyyyyyy wah wah.

GET A DIAPER AND GO SUCK ON YOUR THUMB YOU OVERGROWN BABBIE and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Good. It shouldn't have come this far in the first place.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago
[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 month ago

That moment when for a split second a brahmin realises the world doesn't revolve around them... Just for a split second though.

[–] Balldowern@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

2025-2026 - Year of the Linux Desktop

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Going by title alone, sounds like a false flag. If people that are against read it, they could feel like they're in a comfortable spot and lower pressure. And with so many companies implementing LLMs to their services, the push growing weaker would allow these companies to gain even more space, for there is no vacuum in power.

Still need to read the article itself, but manipulation by headlines is a common strategy.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe, but speaking for myself, my revulsion to the way they are currently trying to use AI is nothing short of visceral. No headline has a chance. It is such an intrusion to personal privacy, and toward incredibly bad ends all around, that I don't give a shit what they say at all.

To get past that, they'd have to stop trying to data farm everything that crosses someone's monitor, stop using AI to support and further large-scale national operations like genocide, and not use every word that anyone's ever written that they can get their hands on to train their LLMs. Oh, and something more than a "You're overreacting!" when it is pointed out that AI output is not at all neutral, but shaped to deliver their own chosen narratives, which its devotees tend to accept without question. They could even -- and I know this is a novel concept -- pay authors and artists for all the work they used without consent and without compensation.

It'll never happen. And I will never not hate AI, for all of these reasons and more (like how they took my fucking em-dash and made it unnatural, so now I'm taking it back).

TL;DR: I hate AI so much and so deeply it's automatic, there's literally nothing they can say I would care about, and the more they try the more repulsed I am. Fuck 'em all.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Let's make this AI boom a thud!

[–] DemandOk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

AI will do fine without Microsoft, nor does it need Palantir and Dogey America. As someone who likes and supports AI, I don't want crappy institutions to influence how it develops.

Anyhow, I will be switching to SteamOS Desktop when that is available. Or Cachy, when Microsoft starts using AI to spy on people.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Sloppy Nadella says wut?

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

If anything in the stupid rumour-mill that is modern mainstream news can be true, can it please be that this AI bubble bursts in spectacular .COM style

[–] FarrellPerks@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Well shit here's to hoping they're right.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

If no one buys these shoes that fall apart after breaking their toes, the growth of the Shoes-That-Injure-The-Wearer industry could really take a hit!

[–] Greddan@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Look at his ugly face.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm going to express a perspective that goes against a lot of the Lemmy hive-mind, so I'm sure I'll be downvoted, but here goes anyway cause I don't give no fucks about downvotes...

When I first heard about LLMs (around 2021 I think), I was pretty neutral on it. "Meh, sounds like some annoying bullshit to piss off customers and attempt to take call-center jobs away. Probably going to flop..." was the perspective I had around the time of my first introduction.

Around 2022 or 2023, the place I was working at the time started heavily pushing people to use it. I was a Cloud Engineer at the time. There wasn't a lot of justification as to "why" we should be using it, other than, "it'll make things easier." Because of my org pushing large numbers of engineers and developers into using something without demonstrating an actual benefit, or reason why it will help immediately caused my brain to signal red flags and become suspicious of it. My neutrality shifted into an ANTI-AI sentiment.

By the end of 2023 (or so), I was pretty vehemently against AI. I don't need to articulate on that too much, we all know the reasons why. Towards the end of last year, I found myself in a weird spot of starting a business and didn't know wtf I was doing, at all. That was the first time that I had a good experience with using Claude. It guided me through the process of creating an LLC, and a bunch of other bullshit that's associated with that. I've had a few good experiences with it for the past few months... it's a lot better than it was.

At this point, I've come to the conclusion that a large problem with AI was what happened in (what I'm calling) the early days (2020-2021), of pushing people to adopt some bullshit that was wholly unsubstantiated, and quite frankly sucked. The expectation for a "boom" was greatly miscalculated, and it still fucking is.

If companies were starting to push people to use it for the first time in 2025, I think we'd be having a much different conversation about AI / LLMs in 2026. I think it has some viable uses, and it does some of the technical aspects of my role substantially faster than I can do them. However, my concerns around the economic, environmental, and political implications of AI still have me maintaining a perspective that it's more trouble than it's worth. In short, "AI isn't all bad on it's own... the system we're trying to add AI to is already fucked and AI is making it worse."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›