this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
214 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

79576 readers
6623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This would actually provide me enough gas each week with my hybrid in office schedule.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

that'd get my small cc bike filled up for my use.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 6 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I wonder is a scaled up version of this could work for grid-scale medium length storage. Smoothing out weeks of dunkleflaute is the main blocker to going to a primarily renewable grid. Gasoline is a lot easier to store than hydrogen and large scale gasoline generators should get close to the efficiency of natural gas peaker plants.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Grid scale storage doesn't strike me as an area of application where high energy density is important, so wouldn't batteries with less conversion loss do an overall better job? I think grid scale Lithium-ion battery stores have become somewhat common.

I'd see gasoline from CO2 capture of interest more for airplanes, drones, ships, maybe even certain modes of long haul terrestrial transport where weight and volume is important.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

I could see this being useful in places where day/night cycle is skewed to prolonged periods of each. Or perhaps holding excess power from summer into winter since days are so much shorter.

But yeah, this doesn’t really seem like the best way to store grid power.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sell these to the "but mah vroom vroom noise" crowd and switch everything to electric.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So power to x, basically

But smaller

Reusing the co2 in the air. Its a good idea.

[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No it's not a good idea.

It's extremely inefficent compared to just using elecricity directly for whatever you're planning to do with it.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

The extension cord won't reach my Airbus

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago

Still a good idea for specific cases though. An example from current news close to me: We have line ships on lake Zürich that can't be electrified because either they are too old to sustain a major internal rework or, for some, they can't carry the battery weight.

For a case like that I'd prefer if they put some CO2 capture stations up to keep running the ships rather than scrapping them prematurely.

... if the capture stations work, that is. Can't trust the word of a startup too much.

All the catches

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›