Even that I would consider wildly unjust. User data would HAVE to be opt IN.
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
1823 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
88987 readers
2870 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Is this from the "poll" where you could click "Yes AI" or "No AI" without any further context or explanation on what the question even implies. Yes the marketing stunt works but that's not a poll one should cite.
Don't get me wrong, I really don't want AI slop in my results but this "poll" is just marketing.
It's the one where I clicked "No AI" and the results page thanked me for voting yes!
load more comments
(1 replies)
and 45% of those respondents were A.I.
that was why i started using ddg
90%? Could be selection bias. I think, the result would be a different one if users would have been asked to in the Google AI tab.
You need to fetch users from different places for your sample to get more meaningful results.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I wonder what percentage of Lemmy users are absolutely sick of seeing variations of the exact same thing, over, and over, and over, and fucking over again.