this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
659 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79879 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Also, we haven’t even got HDR figured out.

I’m still struggling to export some of my older RAWs to HDR. Heck, Lemmy doesn’t support JPEG XL, AVIF, TIFF, HEIF, nothing, so I couldn’t even post them here anyway. And even then, they’d probably only render right in Safari.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The University of Cambridge’s display resolution calculator, which is based on a study from researchers at the university’s Department of Computer Science and Technology and Meta, funded by Meta, and published in Nature in October, suggests that your eyes can only make use of 8K resolution on a 50-inch screen if you’re viewing it from a distance of 1 meter (3.3 feet) or less. Similarly, you would have to be sitting pretty close (2–3 meters/6.6–9.8 feet) to an 80-inch or 100-inch TV for 8K resolution to be beneficial. The findings are similar to those from RTINGs.com.

This is known since at least 2010, because our eyes are limited in optical resolution and in how big a surface we see.

[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never felt the need to go 4k either. I'm totally content to buy 1080p 144hz+ monitors for $100.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We didn't even need 4k yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I don't even have 4K. My main TV is still 1080p and my monitors are 2K.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›